ASUS P8Z77-V Pro/Thunderbolt Review

Published by Marc Büchel on 07.02.13
Page:
« 1 ... 14 15 16 (17) 18 19 20 »

Games

Crysis 800 x 600, low details

Crysis is still one of the games which has very high system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API, High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX9 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.

Crysis DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details)
Review Rating
fps Percent
ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
184.57 110.97 %
Gigabyte Z77X-UP4TH
No Review
182.93 109.99%
Biostar Hi-Fi Z77X
179.41 107.87%
ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
179.14 107.71%
ASUS P8Z77-V Pro/Thunderbolt
No Review
174.57 104.71%
ASUS Maximus V Extreme
174.05 104.65 %
ASUS P8H77-I
No Review
173.23 104.15%
ASUS P8Z77 WS
168.11 101.08%
Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
No Review
167.32 100.60%
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
167.05 100.44%
ASRock Z77 OC Formula
166.44 100.07%
Intel DZ77GA-70K
No Review
166.32 100.00%
ASUS Maximus V Gene
No Review
165.97 99.79%
Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
165.66 99.60%
Gigabyte Z77X-UP7
No Review
165.42 99.46%
ASUS P8Z77-V
No Review
165.00 99.21%
MSI Z77 MPower
163.93 98.56%
ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
163.91 98.55%
Gigabyte Z77-HD4
No Review
163.82 98.50%
ASUS Sabertooth Z77
162.97 97.99%
Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
162.32 97.59%
ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
No Review
162.20 97.52%
ASUS Maximus V Formula
160.84 96.71%
ASRock Z77 Extreme6
160.72 96.63%
more is better


Resident Evil 800 x 600, low details

Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX9 benchmark we can again show CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.

Resident Evil DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details)
Review Rating
fps Percent
Intel DZ77GA-70K
No Review
221.4 100.00%
Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
219.5 99.14%
MSI Z77 MPower
218.8 98.83%
ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
218.7 98.78%
ASUS Sabertooth Z77
218.5 98.69%
ASUS P8Z77-V
No Review
217.7 98.33%
ASRock Z77 Extreme6
215.7 97.43%
Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
215.7 97.43%
Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
No Review
215.7 97.43%
ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
215.6 97.38 %
Gigabyte Z77X-UP4TH
No Review
215.6 97.38%
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
213.2 96.30%
ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
No Review
212.6 96.03%
ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
211.9 95.71%
ASUS Maximus V Gene
No Review
211.6 95.57%
Gigabyte Z77X-UP7
No Review
208.6 94.22%
Gigabyte Z77-HD4
No Review
208.0 93.95%
Biostar Hi-Fi Z77X
208.0 93.95%
ASUS P8Z77 WS
207.7 93.81%
ASUS Maximus V Extreme
207.3 93.63 %
ASUS P8H77-I
No Review
207.2 93.59%
ASRock Z77 OC Formula
206.3 93.18%
ASUS Maximus V Formula
205.3 92.73%
ASUS P8Z77-V Pro/Thunderbolt
No Review
203.6 91.96%
more is better


Street Fighter 4 800 x 600, low details

Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.

Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low details)
Review Rating
fps Percent
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
832.85 106.43%
Gigabyte Z77X-UP4TH
No Review
812.83 103.88%
ASUS Maximus V Extreme
810.15 103.53 %
ASUS P8Z77 WS
808.12 103.27 %
Biostar TZ77XE4 TOverclocker
806.81 103.11%
MSI Z77 MPower
805.95 103.00%
Gigabyte Z77 G1.Sniper 3
803.92 102.74%
ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
802.43 102.55%
ASUS P8Z77-V
No Review
802.37 102.54%
ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
801.05 102.37%
ASUS Maximus V Gene
No Review
797.67 101.94%
ASUS Sabertooth Z77
795.52 101.66%
Biostar Hi-Fi Z77X
794.82 101.57%
Gigabyte Z77X-UP7
No Review
790.48 101.02%
Gigabyte Z77-HD4
No Review
790.37 101.01%
ASUS P8H77-M LE/SI
No Review
789.76 100.93%
Gigabyte Z77MX-D3H
No Review
783.26 100.10%
ASUS P8Z77-V Pro/Thunderbolt
No Review
782.74 100.03%
Intel DZ77GA-70K
No Review
782.50 100.00%
ASUS P8Z77-V Premium
780.81 99.78 %
ASRock Z77 Extreme6
780.76 99.78%
ASUS Maximus V Formula
771.96 98.65%
ASUS P8H77-I
No Review
766.45 97.95%
ASRock Z77 OC Formula
762.70 97.47%
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 11 - PC Mark 7
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 12 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 3 - Features Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 4 - Layout Page 14 - UC Bench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 15 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 6 - BIOS Page 16 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 7 - Test setup Page 17 - Games
Page 8 - 3D Mark 11 Page 18 - Power Consumption
Page 9 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 19 - Performance Rating
Page 10 - 3D Mark 2001 SE  Page 20 - Conclusion



Discuss this article in the forums




Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS P8Z77-V Pro/Thunderbolt Preview Gigabyte Z77X-UP4 TH Preview Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS P8Z77-V Pro/Thunderbolt Review - Motherboards > Intel > Z77 - Reviews - ocaholic