ASUS Radeon R9 280X DirectCU II Top Review

Published by Christian Ney on 10.10.13
Page:
« 1 ... 4 5 6 (7) 8 9 10 ... 22 »

BattleField 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 4xMSAA, Ultra, SSAO Average FPS
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 96.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 90.4
ASUS Radeon R9 280X DirectCU II Top 81.6
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 78.4
AMD Radeon R9 280X 76.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 76.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 72.8
AMD Radeon HD 7970 71.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 66.0
AMD Radeon HD 6990 65.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 62.0
AMD Radeon R9 270X 58.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 55.8
AMD Radeon HD 7870 54.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 50.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 48.6
AMD Radeon HD 7850 44.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 44.2
AMD Radeon HD 7790 36.6
AMD Radeon HD 6970 35.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 33.2
AMD Radeon HD 5870 32.6
AMD Radeon HD 6950 32.0
AMD Radeon HD 6870 29.8
AMD Radeon HD 5850 26.6
More is better






Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - Technical Data / Specifications Page 13 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Preview & Delivery Page 14 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Test Setup Page 15 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 16 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 17 - GTA V
Page 7 - BattleField 3 Page 18 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Borderlands 2 Page 19 - Fan Speed / Noise Level
Page 9 - Bioshock Infinite Page 20 - Temps - Idle / FurMark / BF3
Page 10 - Crysis 3 Page 21 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt
Page 11 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 22 - Conclusion



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article Club3D Radeon HD 7850 royalQueen Review ASUS Radeon R9 270X DirectCU II Top Review Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS Radeon R9 280X DirectCU II Top Review - Graphics cards > Reviews > AMD - Reviews - ocaholic