Prestazioni 2D / 3D / Archiviazione
Prestazioni 2D
| Benchmark/Software |
Sistema di riferimento |
Corsair ONE PRO |
Differenza |
Sintetici |
| PCMark 8 Creative |
5'834 Points |
5'821 Points |
-0.22% |
| Fire Strike Physix |
14'279 Marks |
14'302 Marks |
0.16% |
| 3DMark 11 Physix |
11'835 Marks |
11'849 Marks |
-0.12% |
| SiSoft Sandra Arithmetics Dhrystone |
209.19 GIPS |
208.76 GIPS |
-0.21% |
| SiSoft Sandra Arithmetics Whetstone |
123.14 GFLOPS |
123.68 GFLOPS |
0.44% |
| SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Integer |
559.36 MPixel/sec |
557.34 MPixel/sec |
-0.36% |
| SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Floating Point |
550.75 MPixel/sec |
551.05 MPixel/sec |
0.05% |
| SiSoft Sandra Cryptography AES |
12.99 GB/sec |
12.97 GB/sec |
-0.15% |
| SiSoft Sandra Cryptography SHA |
6.48 GB/sec |
6.50 GB/sec |
0.31% |
| Black Hole |
22'236 Points |
22'187 Points |
-0.22% |
Real-World |
| WinRAR |
11'078 KB/sec |
11'049 KB/sec |
-0.26% |
| 7Zip |
27'766 MIPS |
27'803 MIPS |
0.13% |
| Frybench |
221 sec |
220 sec |
0.45% |
| Cinebench R15 |
980 Points |
978 Points |
-0.20% |
| Handbreak h.264 |
18.31 fps |
18.29 fps |
-0.11% |
| Handbreak h.265 |
12.47 fps |
12.46 fps |
-0.08% |
| Photoshop |
11.5 sec |
11.4 sec |
0.87% |
| Microsoft Excel |
343 sec |
342 sec |
-0.29% |
La differenza media tra le prestazioni ottenute dal sistema di Corsair e il nostro sistema di riferimento è di circa il 2%. In altre parole il sistema è ben costruito e configurato.
Prestazioni in 3D
| Benchmark/Spiel |
Sistema di riferimento |
Corsair ONE PRO |
Differenza |
Sintetici |
| 3DMark Time Spy - GPU Score |
7'381 Marks |
7'299 Marks |
-1.11% |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - GPU Score |
21'837 Marks |
21'882 Marks |
0.21% |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme - GPU Score |
11'001 Marks |
11'023 Marks |
0.20% |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra - GPU Score |
5'466 |
5432 Marks |
-0.62% |
| 3DMark VRMark |
183.67 fps |
183.42 fps |
-0.14% |
| SteamVR Performance Test |
11.00 Points |
11.00 Points |
0.00% |
Real-World |
| ArmA 3 - 1080p (FullHD) |
48.00 fps |
48.00 fps |
0.00% |
| ArmA 3 - 1440p (WHQD) |
44.00 fps |
44.00 fps |
0.00% |
| ArmA 3 - 2160p (UHD) |
38.00 fps |
38.00 fps |
0.00% |
| |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX11- 1080p (FullHD) |
62.80 fps |
62.50 fps |
-0.48% |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX11 - 1440p (WHQD) |
60.50 fps |
60.60 fps |
0.17% |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX11 - 2160p (UHD) |
52.10 fps |
52.10 fps |
0.00% |
| |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 1080p (FullHD) |
73.50 fps |
73.80 fps |
0.41% |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 1440p (WHQD) |
67.80 fps |
67.90 fps |
0.15% |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 2160p (UHD) |
56.20 fps |
56.00 fps |
-0.36% |
| |
| Doom - 1080p (FullHD) |
136.51 fps |
135.94 fps |
-0.42% |
| Doom - 1440p (WHQD) |
100.58 fps |
100.03 fps |
-0.55% |
| Doom - 2160p (UHD) |
60.94 fps |
60.82 fps |
-0.20% |
| |
| Far Cry Primal - 1080p (FullHD) |
111.00 fps |
110.00 fps |
-0.90% |
| Far Cry Primal - 1440p (WHQD) |
80.00 fps |
80.00 fps |
0.00% |
| Far Cry Primal - 2160p (UHD) |
44.00 fps |
43.00 fps |
-2.27% |
| |
| GTA V - 1080p (FullHD) |
95.00 fps |
96.12 fps |
1.18% |
| GTA V - 1440p (WHQD) |
59.74 fps |
59.53 fps |
-0.35% |
| GTA V - 2160p (UHD) |
30.22 fps |
30.06 fps |
-0.53% |
| |
| Rainbox Six Siege - 1080p (FullHD) |
127.40 fps |
127.76 fps |
0.28% |
| Rainbox Six Siege - 1440p (WHQD) |
80.30 fps |
80.05 fps |
-0.31% |
| Rainbox Six Siege - 2160p (UHD) |
39.50 fps |
39.42 fps |
-0.20% |
| |
| Total War Warhammer DX11 - 1080p (FullHD) |
137.00 fps |
136.14 fps |
-0.63% |
| Total War Warhammer DX11- 1440p (WHQD) |
97.00 fps |
96.83 fps |
-0.18% |
| Total War Warhammer DX11 - 2160p (UHD) |
53.80 fps |
53.88 fps |
0.15% |
| |
| Total War Warhammer DX12 - 1080p (FullHD) |
113.80 fps |
113.62 fps |
-0.16% |
| Total War Warhammer DX12 - 1440p (WHQD) |
90.50 fps |
90.59 fps |
0.10% |
| Total War Warhammer DX12 - 2160p (UHD) |
49.50 fps |
49.61 fps |
0.22% |
| |
| XCOM 2 - 1080p (FullHD) |
73.04 fps |
73.00 fps |
-0.05% |
| XCOM 2 - 1440p (WHQD) |
48.81 fps |
48.87 fps |
0.12% |
| XCOM 2 - 2160p (UHD) |
26.60 fps |
26.44 fps |
-0.60% |
Anche per le prestazioni in 3D la differenza tra le due configurazioni è di appena il 2%. Solo nel caso di Far Cry Primal 2160p abbiamo rilevato una variazione superiore al 2%. Questa misurazione è legata al benchmark stesso che non mostra più di un decimale.
Prestazioni archivizione
| Benchmark |
Sistema di riferimento |
Corsair ONE PRO |
Differenza |
Corsair Force LE 960GB |
| Crystal Disk Mark Seq Q32 T1 Read |
550.2 MB/s |
563.2 MB/s |
+2.30% |
| Crystal Disk Mark Seq Q32 T1 Write |
528.9 MB/s |
552.1 MB/s |
+4.10% |
| Crystal Disk Mark 4K Q32 T1 Read |
400.1 MB/s |
375.4 MB/s |
-7.17% |
| Crystal Disk Mark 4K Q32 T1 Write |
355.8 MB/s |
350.2 MB/s |
-1.57% |
| Crystal Disk Mark Seq Read |
523.9 MB/s |
553.3 MB/s |
+5.60% |
| Crystal Disk Mark Seq Write |
521.0 MB/s |
523.1 MB/s |
+0.39% |
| Crystal Disk Mark 4K Read |
40.28 MB/s |
37.45 MB/s |
-7.02% |
| Crystal Disk Mark 4K Write |
144.9 MB/s |
136.8 MB/s |
-5.59% |
Anche in questa serie di test la differenza è minima.
Digitec X3000 Gaming PC Review 