Corsair ONE PRO Review

Publié par Luca Rocchi le 08.06.17
Page:
« 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 »

Performance 2D / 3D / Storage


Performance 2D


Benchmark/Software Reference system Corsair ONE PRO Deviation

Synthetic

PCMark 8 Creative 5'834 Points 5'821 Points -0.22%
Fire Strike Physix 14'279 Marks 14'302 Marks 0.16%
3DMark 11 Physix 11'835 Marks 11'849 Marks -0.12%
SiSoft Sandra Arithmetics Dhrystone 209.19 GIPS 208.76 GIPS -0.21%
SiSoft Sandra Arithmetics Whetstone 123.14 GFLOPS 123.68 GFLOPS 0.44%
SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Integer 559.36 MPixel/sec 557.34 MPixel/sec -0.36%
SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Floating Point 550.75 MPixel/sec 551.05 MPixel/sec 0.05%
SiSoft Sandra Cryptography AES 12.99 GB/sec 12.97 GB/sec -0.15%
SiSoft Sandra Cryptography SHA 6.48 GB/sec 6.50 GB/sec 0.31%
Black Hole 22'236 Points 22'187 Points -0.22%

Real-World

WinRAR 11'078 KB/sec 11'049 KB/sec -0.26%
7Zip 27'766 MIPS 27'803 MIPS 0.13%
Frybench 221 sec 220 sec 0.45%
Cinebench R15 980 Points 978 Points -0.20%
Handbreak h.264 18.31 fps 18.29 fps -0.11%
Handbreak h.265 12.47 fps 12.46 fps -0.08%
Photoshop 11.5 sec 11.4 sec 0.87%
Microsoft Excel 343 sec 342 sec -0.29%


Looking at the values above we see that the deviation is within the measurement error of +/-2%. Therefore the Corsair ONE PRO can be described as a well-built and well-configured system.

Performance 3D


Benchmark/Spiel Reference system Corsair ONE PRO Deviation

Synthetic

3DMark Time Spy - GPU Score 7'381 Marks 7'299 Marks -1.11%
3DMark Fire Strike - GPU Score 21'837 Marks 21'882 Marks 0.21%
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme - GPU Score 11'001 Marks 11'023 Marks 0.20%
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra - GPU Score 5'466 5432 Marks -0.62%
3DMark VRMark 183.67 fps 183.42 fps -0.14%
SteamVR Performance Test 11.00 Points 11.00 Points 0.00%

Real-World

ArmA 3 - 1080p (FullHD) 48.00 fps 48.00 fps 0.00%
ArmA 3 - 1440p (WHQD) 44.00 fps 44.00 fps 0.00%
ArmA 3 - 2160p (UHD) 38.00 fps 38.00 fps 0.00%
 
Ashes of the Singularity DX11- 1080p (FullHD) 62.80 fps 62.50 fps -0.48%
Ashes of the Singularity DX11 - 1440p (WHQD) 60.50 fps 60.60 fps 0.17%
Ashes of the Singularity DX11 - 2160p (UHD) 52.10 fps 52.10 fps 0.00%
 
Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 1080p (FullHD) 73.50 fps 73.80 fps 0.41%
Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 1440p (WHQD) 67.80 fps 67.90 fps 0.15%
Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 2160p (UHD) 56.20 fps 56.00 fps -0.36%
 
Doom - 1080p (FullHD) 136.51 fps 135.94 fps -0.42%
Doom - 1440p (WHQD) 100.58 fps 100.03 fps -0.55%
Doom - 2160p (UHD) 60.94 fps 60.82 fps -0.20%
 
Far Cry Primal - 1080p (FullHD) 111.00 fps 110.00 fps -0.90%
Far Cry Primal - 1440p (WHQD) 80.00 fps 80.00 fps 0.00%
Far Cry Primal - 2160p (UHD) 44.00 fps 43.00 fps -2.27%
 
GTA V - 1080p (FullHD) 95.00 fps 96.12 fps 1.18%
GTA V - 1440p (WHQD) 59.74 fps 59.53 fps -0.35%
GTA V - 2160p (UHD) 30.22 fps 30.06 fps -0.53%
 
Rainbox Six Siege - 1080p (FullHD) 127.40 fps 127.76 fps 0.28%
Rainbox Six Siege - 1440p (WHQD) 80.30 fps 80.05 fps -0.31%
Rainbox Six Siege - 2160p (UHD) 39.50 fps 39.42 fps -0.20%
 
Total War Warhammer DX11 - 1080p (FullHD) 137.00 fps 136.14 fps -0.63%
Total War Warhammer DX11- 1440p (WHQD) 97.00 fps 96.83 fps -0.18%
Total War Warhammer DX11 - 2160p (UHD) 53.80 fps 53.88 fps 0.15%
 
Total War Warhammer DX12 - 1080p (FullHD) 113.80 fps 113.62 fps -0.16%
Total War Warhammer DX12 - 1440p (WHQD) 90.50 fps 90.59 fps 0.10%
Total War Warhammer DX12 - 2160p (UHD) 49.50 fps 49.61 fps 0.22%
 
XCOM 2 - 1080p (FullHD) 73.04 fps 73.00 fps -0.05%
XCOM 2 - 1440p (WHQD) 48.81 fps 48.87 fps 0.12%
XCOM 2 - 2160p (UHD) 26.60 fps 26.44 fps -0.60%


Looking at the values above we see that the deviation is within the measurement error of +/-2% with the exception of one value. In the case of the Far Cry Primal 2160p (UHD) benchmark routine we see that the +/- 2% mark has been surpassed. In this particular case it's highly likely that the breach of the +/-2% mark has happened because the frame rates were rounded to the lower/higher full number. If the benchmark routine would give as numbers to the second digit after the comma it's very probable that the difference would have been significantly lower.

Performance Storage


Benchmark Reference system Corsair ONE PRO Deviation

Corsair Force LE 960GB

Crystal Disk Mark Seq Q32 T1 Read 550.2 MB/s 563.2 MB/s +2.30%
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Q32 T1 Write 528.9 MB/s 552.1 MB/s +4.10%
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Q32 T1 Read 400.1 MB/s 375.4 MB/s -7.17%
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Q32 T1 Write 355.8 MB/s 350.2 MB/s -1.57%
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Read 523.9 MB/s 553.3 MB/s +5.60%
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Write 521.0 MB/s 523.1 MB/s +0.39%
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Read 40.28 MB/s 37.45 MB/s -7.02%
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Write 144.9 MB/s 136.8 MB/s -5.59%


Looking at the values above we see that the deviation is +4%/-7%. Considering that our test system is equipped with a Samsung 850 Evo SSD eveything is perfectly fine.




Naviguer à travers les articles
Article précédent Digitec X3000 Gaming PC Review MIFCOM Battlebox Titan Xp Review Article suivant
comments powered by Disqus

Corsair ONE PRO Review - Ordinateurs - Reviews - ocaholic