Gigabyte X170-Extreme ECC Review
Published by Marc Büchel on 10.05.16Page:
3D Mark
Ice Storm
| 3D Mark Ice Storm Score | Prozent | |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Impact | 196'907 | 101.75% |
| MSI Z170A Xpower Gaming Titanium Edition | 196'281 | 101.42% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Gene | 195'178 | 100.85% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Hero | 195'737 | 101.14% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger | 195'491 | 101.02% |
| ASUS Z170 Pro Gaming | 195'151 | 100.32% |
| ASUS Z170-A | 195'107 | 100.82% |
| ASUS Z170 Deluxe | 193'524 | 100.00% |
| Gigabyte X170-Extreme ECC | 193'381 | 99.93% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme | 192'036 | 99.23% |
| ASRock Z170 OC Formula | 191'574 | 98.99% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme Assembly | 191'348 | 98.87% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-OCE | 187'909 | 97.10% |
| Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming G1 | 187'768 | 97.03% |
| MSI Z170I Gaming Pro AC | 185'586 | 95.82% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-SQ | 184'489 | 95.33% |
| MSI Z170 Gaming M7 | 186'491 | 96.37% |
| ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ | 185'448 | 95.83% |
| mehr ist besser | ||
Ice Storm Physics
| 3D Mark Ice Storm Physics Score | Prozent | |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Impact | 68'208 | 104.29% |
| ASUS Z170-A | 68'073 | 104.08% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger | 67'026 | 102.48% |
| MSI Z170A Xpower Gaming Titanium Edition | 66'616 | 101.16% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Hero | 66'332 | 101.42% |
| ASUS Z170 Pro Gaming | 65'716 | 100.48% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Gene | 65'681 | 100.42% |
| Gigabyte X170-Extreme ECC | 65'590 | 100.28% |
| ASUS Z170 Deluxe | 65'404 | 100.00% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme | 64'711 | 98.94% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme Assembly | 63'640 | 97.30% |
| Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming G1 | 63'524 | 97.13% |
| ASRock Z170 OC Formula | 63'385 | 96.91% |
| MSI Z170I Gaming Pro AC | 63'257 | 96.71% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-OCE | 63'077 | 96.44% |
| ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ | 62'866 | 96.12% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-SQ | 62'775 | 95.98% |
| MSI Z170 Gaming M7 | 62'072 | 94.91% |
| mehr ist besser | ||
Fire Strike
| 3D Mark Fire Strike Score | Prozent | |
| ASRock Z170 OC Formula | 12'258 | 101.40% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme | 12'168 | 100.65% |
| Gigabyte X170-Extreme ECC | 12'144 | 100.45% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Impact | 12'108 | 100.16% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-OCE | 12'105 | 100.13% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme Assembly | 12'103 | 100.12% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-SQ | 12'103 | 100.12% |
| ASUS Z170 Deluxe | 12'089 | 100.00% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Gene | 12'085 | 99.97% |
| ASUS Z170-A | 12'085 | 99.97% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger | 12'081 | 99.93% |
| ASUS Z170 Pro Gaming | 12'081 | 99.93% |
| Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming G1 | 12'071 | 99.85% |
| MSI Z170A Xpower Gaming Titanium Edition | 12'068 | 99.83% |
| MSI Z170I Gaming Pro AC | 12'066 | 99.81% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Hero | 12'061 | 99.80% |
| MSI Z170 Gaming M7 | 12'061 | 99.80% |
| ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ | 12'059 | 99.75% |
| mehr ist besser | ||
Fire Strike Physics
| 3D Mark Fire Strike Physics Score | Prozent | |
| ASUS Z170 Pro Gaming | 13'050 | 100.48% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger | 13'043 | 100.33% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Impact | 13'009 | 100.07% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-OCE | 13'001 | 100.01% |
| ASUS Z170 Deluxe | 13'000 | 100.00% |
| Gigabyte X170-Extreme ECC | 13'000 | 100.00% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme | 12'998 | 99.98% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme Assembly | 12'993 | 99.95% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Hero | 12'993 | 99.95% |
| ASRock Z170 OC Formula | 12'989 | 99.92% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-SQ | 12'988 | 99.91% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Gene | 12'987 | 99.90% |
| Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming G1 | 12'977 | 99.82% |
| ASUS Z170-A | 12'972 | 99.78% |
| MSI Z170A Xpower Gaming Titanium Edition | 12'966 | 99.74% |
| MSI Z170I Gaming Pro AC | 12'951 | 99.62% |
| ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ | 12'938 | 99.52% |
| MSI Z170 Gaming M7 | 12'925 | 99.42% |
| mehr ist besser | ||
comments powered by Disqus
|
|