Gigabyte X170-Extreme ECC Review
Publié par Marc Büchel le 10.05.16Page:
Tomb Raider
Low resolution - 1024 x 768
| Tomb Raider (low resolution, low details) | fps | Écart |
| ASUS Z170 Deluxe | 264.6 | 100.00% |
| ASUS Z170 Pro Gaming | 262.6 | 99.24% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme | 261.4 | 98.79% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Hero | 261.0 | 98.64% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Assembly | 260.8 | 98.56% |
| Gigabyte X170-Extreme ECC | 260.8 | 98.56% |
| ASUS Z170-A | 260.6 | 98.49% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Gene | 260.0 | 98.26% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Impact | 259.3 | 98.00% |
| ASRock Z170 OC Formula | 258.1 | 97.54% |
| MSI Z170 Gaming M7 | 258.1 | 97.54% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-OCE | 258.1 | 97.54% |
| MSI Z170A Xpower Gaming Titanium Edition | 258.0 | 97.51% |
| MSI Z170I Gaming Pro AC | 258.0 | 97.51% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-SQ | 258.0 | 97.51% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger | 257.2 | 97.20% |
| Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming G1 | 257.1 | 97.17% |
| ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ | 255.1 | 96.41% |
| Le plus haut est meilleur | ||
High resolution - 1920 x 1080
| Tomb Raider (high resolution, high details) | fps | Écart |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme | 150.8 | 101.96% |
| MSI Z170A Xpower Gaming Titanium Edition | 150.0 | 101.42% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger | 149.8 | 101.28% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Assembly | 149.2 | 100.88% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Impact | 149.2 | 100.88% |
| Gigabyte X170-Extreme ECC | 148.8 | 100.61% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-OCE | 148.4 | 100.34% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Hero | 147.9 | 100.00% |
| ASUS Z170 Deluxe | 147.9 | 100.00% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-SQ | 147.9 | 100.00% |
| ASRock Z170 OC Formula | 146.2 | 98.85% |
| Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming G1 | 145.9 | 98.65% |
| MSI Z170 Gaming M7 | 144.3 | 97.57% |
| ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ | 144.0 | 97.36% |
| ASUS Z170 Pro Gaming | 144.0 | 97.36% |
| MSI Z170I Gaming Pro AC | 143.8 | 97.23% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Gene | 143.1 | 96.75% |
| ASUS Z170-A | 142.0 | 96.01% |
| Le plus haut est meilleur | ||
comments powered by Disqus
|
|