Conclusion
Having a closer look at the results we gathered
while testing eight different
games and two different benchmarks with two different presets, we see that the
Intel Core i7-3960X, with our "low-preset" is on average 5 percent faster than the
Core i7-3930K. Switching to our "high-preset" makes the Intel Core
i7-3960X
become 7 percent quicker than the Core i7-3930K. Overclocking the Intel Core
i7-3960X to 4.5 GHz makes the performance with our "low-preset" go up by
22 percent and when it comes to the high-preset the increase in performance is
17 percent. Regarding the Core i7-3930K the
situation is a little bit different: 20 percent gain with "low-preset" and
19 percent
with "high-preset". Other than that a quick look at power consumption
is also interesting. In this case we see that overclocking the Core
i7-3960X to 4.5 GHz makes power consumption of our system go up by 40 percent. With the
Core i7-3930K we see there is an additional 47
percent needed.
In the past we've been testing the same system equipped with one as well as two high-end
single GPU graphics cards. Especially with one GPU and in case of our high-preset the graphics
card is then going to be the limiting factor, meaning changing the CPU or even
overclocking processors doesn't make for a decent performance difference. As
soon as we're adding a second or even a third high-end graphics card, the bottleneck regarding
graphics cards is open and overclocking CPU architecture as well as CPU clocks
will make a difference even with the high preset.
Usually we add a recommendation at this point where we're talking about whether
upgrading would make sense or not. In case of the CPUs tested here, there is
simply no point in talking about this, since upgrading to a Core i7-3960X, if
you already have a an i7-3930K is nonsense and a complete waste of money. If
you've put some money aside, we highly recommend to wait for Intels upcoming
i7-5000 Series CPUs.