NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN - Aircooling vs. Watercooling EK-FC TITAN

Published by Marc Büchel on 30.04.14
Page:
« 1 2 (3) 4 5 6 ... 16 »

3DMark - Fire Strike



Stock Clocks Points Index
Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) 8'396 100.00 %
Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) 8'568 102.05 %
  More is better


Overclocking Points Index
Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1150 / Mem 1850 MHz) 10'175 121.18 %
Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1185 / Mem 1850 MHz) 10'311 122.80 %
  More is better


3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme

Stock Clocks Points Index
Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) 4'271 100.00 %
Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) 4'313 101.64 %
  More is better


Overclocking Points Index
Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1150 / Mem 1850 MHz) 5'273 123.46 %
Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1185 / Mem 1850 MHz) 5'417 126.83 %
  More is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 10 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 11 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 12 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 4 Page 13 - Power Consumption
Page 6 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - Temperatures
Page 7 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Index
Page 8 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Conclusion



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC - Watercooling EK-FC GTX780 DCII vs. Aircooling ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum - Watercooling EK FC-R9-290X Matrix vs. Aircooling Next article
comments powered by Disqus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN - Aircooling vs. Watercooling EK-FC TITAN - Graphics cards > Aircooling vs. Watercooling - Reviews - ocaholic