NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN - Aircooling vs. Watercooling EK-FC TITAN
Published by Marc Büchel on 30.04.14Page:
3DMark - Fire Strike
| Stock Clocks | Points | Indice |
| Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) | 8'396 | 100.00 % |
| Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) | 8'568 | 102.05 % |
| Più alto è meglio | ||
| Overclocking | Points | Indice |
| Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1150 / Mem 1850 MHz) | 10'175 | 121.18 % |
| Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1185 / Mem 1850 MHz) | 10'311 | 122.80 % |
| Più alto è meglio | ||
3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme
| Stock Clocks | Points | Indice |
| Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) | 4'271 | 100.00 % |
| Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 837 / Mem 1502 MHz) | 4'313 | 101.64 % |
| Più alto è meglio | ||
| Overclocking | Points | Indice |
| Aircooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1150 / Mem 1850 MHz) | 5'273 | 123.46 % |
| Watercooling GTX TITAN (GPU 1185 / Mem 1850 MHz) | 5'417 | 126.83 % |
| Più alto è meglio | ||
| Navigate through the articles | |
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC - Watercooling EK-FC GTX780 DCII vs. Aircooling |
ASUS R9 290X Matrix Platinum - Watercooling EK FC-R9-290X Matrix vs. Aircooling
 |
|
|