ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC - Watercooling EK-FC GTX780 DCII vs. Aircooling

Published by Hiwa Pouri on 01.04.14
Page:
« 1 2 (3) 4 5 6 ... 16 »

3DMark - Fire Strike



Stock Clocks Points Index
Aircooling ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC (GPU 954 / Mem 1750 MHz) 10'303 100.00 %
Watercooling ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC (GPU 954 / Mem 1750 MHz) 10'425 101.18 %
  More is better


Overclocking Points Index
Aircooling ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC (GPU 1100 / Mem 1850 MHz) 10'714 103.89 %
Watercooling ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC (GPU 1200 / Mem 1950 MHz) 11'074 107.38 %
  More is better


3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme

Stock Clocks Points Index
Aircooling ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC (GPU 954 / Mem 1750 MHz) 5'248 100.00 %
Watercooling ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC (GPU 954 / Mem 1750 MHz) 5'263 100.26 %
  More is better


Overclocking Points Index
Aircooling ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC (GPU 1100 / Mem 1850 MHz) 5'478 104.38 %
Watercooling ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC (GPU 1200 / Mem 1950 MHz) 5'689 108.40 %
  More is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 10 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 11 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 12 - Metro: Last Light
Page 5 - BattleField 4 Page 13 - Power Consumption
Page 6 - BattleField 3 Page 14 - Temperatures
Page 7 - Bioshock Infinite Page 15 - Index
Page 8 - Crysis 3 Page 16 - Conclusion



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS R9 280X DirectCU II - Watercooling EK FC-R9-280X vs. Aircooling NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN - Aircooling vs. Watercooling EK-FC TITAN Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC - Watercooling EK-FC GTX780 DCII vs. Aircooling - Graphics cards > Aircooling vs. Watercooling - Reviews - ocaholic