Conclusion
Last
summer we published a similar series of articles, where we were analyzing gaming
performance on the basis of two different processors. Back in the days it became
very clear that performance differences between two CPU's at high resolutions
are close to zero. The reason for this can be found within the fact, that the
processor isn't the bottleneck of a system, when you're playing games at high
resolutions. In this case it's the graphics card, which has to work overtime. In
case of lower resolutions the influence of the processor becomes clearly
visible, since the graphics card isn't the limiting factor anymore.
Having a closer look at the results we gathered while testing seven different
games and two different benchmarks with two different presets, we see that the
Intel Core i7-4960X, with our "low-preset" is on average 5.98 percent faster than the
Core i7-4930K. Switching to our "high-preset" makes the Intel Core
i7-4960X's
become 1.22 percent quicker than the Core i7-4930K. Overclocking the Intel Core
i7-4960X to 4.5 GHz makes the performance
with our "low-preset" go up by almost 7 percent but when it comes to the high-preset
the increase in performance is only 0.5 percent. Regarding the Core i7-4930K the
situation is similar: 4 percent gain with "low-preset" and 0.5 percent
with "high-preset".
At this point we certainly have to have a look at prices. In this case we always
head over to Geizhals and these days a Core i7-4960X goes for no less than 849
Euro, whereas 488.69 Euro are enough for a Core i7-4930K. It's nothing new that
Intel's Extreme Edition processors are rather pricy, which, considering the
results gathered here, translates into the following conclusion. If you care
about frames per second in a game, then definitely save these almost 400
additional bucks and spend them on a high-end VGA or even a second VGA, if it's
insane performance you need. Everything else is a waste of money in our opinion.