Re: The NAS dilemma - a dive into the depths of storage
#13
Alright, so I had some time to spare this weekend and decided to test out the peformance of my new drives.
As you probably know, any decent PCI-E disk controller performs better than an on-board controller (Mr. Marvell, if you are reading this...). This turned out to be true; when we look at the random seeking speeds of the WD2000FYYZ, the 2720SGL clearly provides better results than the on-board controller of the P8B-WS. My Rampage III Extreme's "SATA-3" Marvell controller also scored bad results, compared to the 2720SGL. The two SSDs may be different, but still the KC300 managed to beat the 64GB M4 at almost all stages.
Apart from that, for the sake of this benchmark, I quickly tested a RAID0 array (with Windows's disk management utility and four drives) and it turned out to be impressive: over 600Mo/s in both sequential read and write ! Random seeking speeds also greatly improved, compared to the single drive test.
The 2-drive RAID0 array shows an approximate performance of a RAIDz2 (or RAID6) with four drives. That's the kind of results I should get out of my NAS, for now. This excludes the ARC which is much faster.
Now all I'm waiting for is the case.
Once I get it, everything will be at its place and ready to go. From that point I'll start real-world benchmarking (game loading, movie loading speed, media library access speed, etc.).
Edited by rewarder on 2013/12/30 6:49:55
Edited by rewarder on 2013/12/30 6:50:18
Edited by rewarder on 2013/12/30 6:50:27
Edited by rewarder on 2013/12/30 6:50:41
Edited by Dreadlocky on 2013/12/30 9:35:19
Edited by Dreadlocky on 2013/12/30 9:36:59
Edited by Dreadlocky on 2013/12/30 9:37:36