3DMark 11
3DMark 11 is
Futuremarks latest benchmark for the entire graphical subsystem. The
benchmark uses DirectX 11 and it supports all recent features which can
possibly generate high load on a GPU. Therefore you find tessellation,
compute shader calculations, divers lighting effects and different
depth of filed animations. Following we publish values regarding the
performance preset of 3DMark 11.
| 3DMark
11 Total |
Score |
Percent |
| AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire |
8'772 |
245.23 % |
| ASUS EAH6990 (880 MHz / 5'000 MHz) |
8'625 |
241.12 % |
| ASUS EAH6990 (830 MHz / 5'000 MHz) |
8'370 |
233.99 % |
| ASUS GTX 590 |
8'123 |
227.09 % |
| NVIDIA GTX 590 |
8'043 |
224.85 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 Matrix Platinum |
6'356 |
177.69 % |
| MSI GTX 580 Lightning |
6'048 |
160.08 % |
| Palit GTX 580 SLI (3DMark11 wasn't supported in SLI by nVidia
Drivers) |
5'841 |
163.29 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 DirectCUII |
5'988 |
167.40 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 |
5'803 |
162.23 % |
| ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII |
5'335 |
149.15 % |
| ASUS GTX 570 DirectCUII |
5'273 |
147.14 % |
| ASUS ENGTX 560 TI 448 DCII/2DIS/1280MD5 |
5'212 |
145.71 % |
| ASUS EAH6970 2GB |
5'175 |
144.67 % |
| Zotac GTX480 SLI (3DMark11 wasn't supported in SLI by nVidia
Drivers) |
5'046 |
141.07 % |
| Zotac GTX 480 |
4'922 |
137.60 % |
| ASUS EAH6950 2GB |
4'606 |
128.77 % |
| ASUS GTX 560 Ti DirectCUII Top |
4'551 |
127.23 % |
| Gigabyte GTX460 Super Overclock |
3'754 |
104.95 % |
| ASUS EAH6850 |
3'577 |
100.00 % |
| EVGA GTX 460 EE |
3'404 |
95.16 % |
| ASUS GTX 550 Ti DirectCU Top |
2'717 |
75.96 % |
| ASUS EAH6770 DC SL/2DI/1GD5 |
2'713 |
75.85 % |
| ASUS ENGT440 |
1'327 |
37.10 % |
| ASUS ENGT430 |
1'075 |
30.05 % |
| ASUS EAH5550 |
1'017 |
28.43 % |
| |
more is better |
| 3DMark
11 GPU |
Score |
Percent |
| AMD Radeon
HD6970 CrossFire |
10'189 |
305.52 % |
| ASUS EAH6990 (880 MHz / 5'000 MHz) |
9'977 |
299.16 % |
| ASUS EAH6990 (830 MHz / 5'000 MHz) |
9'571 |
286.98 % |
| ASUS GTX 590 |
8'914 |
267.29 % |
| NVIDIA GTX 590 |
8'854 |
265.49 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 Matrix Platinum |
6'314 |
189.32 % |
| MSI GTX 580 Lightning |
5'952 |
178.47 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 DirectCUII |
5'872 |
176.07 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 |
5'812 |
174.27 % |
| Palit ENGTX 580 SLI (3DMark11 wasn't supported in SLI by nVidia
Drivers) |
5'697 |
170.82 % |
| ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII |
5'132 |
153.88 % |
| ASUS GTX 570 DirectCUII |
5'082 |
152.38 % |
| ASUS ENGTX 560 TI 448 DCII/2DIS/1280MD5 |
5'007 |
150.13 % |
| ASUS EAH6970 2GB |
4'949 |
148.40 % |
| Zotac GTX480 SLI (3DMark11 wasn't supported in SLI by nVidia
Drivers) |
4'870 |
146.03 % |
| Zotac GTX 480 |
4'802 |
143.99 % |
| ASUS GTX 560 Ti DirectCUII Top |
4'341 |
130.16 % |
| ASUS EAH6950 2GB |
4'108 |
123.18 % |
| Gigabyte GTX460 Super Overclock |
3'562 |
106.81 % |
| ASUS EAH6850 |
3'335 |
100.00 % |
| EVGA GTX 460 EE |
3'148 |
94.39 % |
| ASUS EAH6770 DC SL/2DI/1GD5 |
2'460 |
73.76 % |
| ASUS GTX 550 Ti DirectCU Top |
2'440 |
73.16 % |
| ASUS ENGT440 |
1'160 |
34.78 % |
| ASUS ENGT430 |
937 |
28.10 % |
| ASUS EAH5550 |
882 |
26.45 % |
| |
more is better |
3DMark Vantage
3DMark Vantage is able to squeeze nearly everything out of a
recent system. Therefore the feature liste is also pretty long:
DirectX10, FP16-HDR, motion blur, parallax occlusion mapping,
GPU-physics simulation and different shader effects are being used to
even make recent high-end systems struggle.
| 3DMark
Vantage |
Score |
Percent |
| Palit GTX 580 SLI |
36'482 |
262.50 % |
| AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire |
25'076 |
180.43 % |
| nVidia GTX 295 SLI |
24'638 |
177.28 % |
| Zotac GTX480 SLI |
24'520 |
176.43 % |
| ASUS EAH6990 (880 MHz / 5'000 MHz) |
24'353 |
175.22 % |
| ASUS EAH6990 (830 MHz / 5'000 MHz) |
24'309 |
174.91 % |
| ASUS GTX 590 |
23'995 |
172.65 % |
| NVIDIA GTX 590 |
23'588 |
169.72 % |
| MSI GTX 580 Lightning |
22'725 |
163.51 % |
| ASUS ARES 5870X2 2DIS 4GD5 |
22'496 |
161.86 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 Matrix Platinum |
22'382 |
161.04 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 DirectCUII |
21'341 |
153.55 % |
| ASUS ENGTX 580 |
21'171 |
152.42 % |
| ASUS GTX 570 DirectCUII |
19'614 |
141.13 % |
| ZOTAC GTX 285 SLI |
19'441 |
139.88 % |
| ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII |
19'165 |
137.90 % |
| ZOTAC GTX 275 1792MB SLI |
19'098 |
137.41 % |
| ASUS EAH6970 2GB |
19'019 |
136.85 % |
| ASUS ENGTX 560 TI 448 DCII/2DIS/1280MD5 |
19'016 |
136.82 % |
| ASUS EAH5970 |
18'895 |
135.95 % |
| ASUS GTX 560 Ti DirectCUII Top |
18'273 |
131.48 % |
| Gigabyte HD5870 Super Overclock |
18'244 |
131.27 % |
| Zotac GTX 480 |
17'859 |
128.50 % |
| MSI HD 5870 Lightning |
17'732 |
127.58 % |
| nVidia GTX 295 |
17'598 |
126.62 % |
| ASUS EAH6950 2GB |
17'485 |
125.81 % |
| ASUS GTX 470 |
16'730 |
120.37 % |
| ASUS EAH5870 |
16'056 |
115.52 % |
| Gigabyte GTX460 Super Overclock |
16'024 |
115.30 % |
| ASUS EAH6850 DirectCU |
15'301 |
110.09 % |
| EVGA GTX 460 EE |
14'606 |
105.09 % |
| ASUS EAH5850 |
13'898 |
100.00 % |
| ASUS GTX285 Matrix |
13'047 |
93.87 % |
| MSI GTX 275 Lightning |
12'323 |
88.09 % |
| ASUS GTX 550 Ti DirectCU Top |
11'793 |
84.85 % |
| ASUS EAH6770 DC SL/2DI/1GD5 |
10'806 |
77.75 % |
| ASUS EAH3870X2 |
9'508 |
68.41 % |
| ASUS ENGTS250 DK |
8'481 |
61.02 % |
| EVGA 8800 GT 512MB |
6'427 |
46.24 % |
| ASUS ENGT440 |
5'827 |
41.93 % |
| Zotac 9600 GT ECO |
4'803 |
34.56 % |
| ASUS ENGT430 |
4'609 |
33.16 % |
| ASUS EAH5550 |
3'614 |
26.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| 3DMark
Vantage GPU |
Score |
Percent |
| Palit GTX 580 SLI |
33'378 |
254.08 % |
| AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire |
29'775 |
226.65 % |
| Zotac GTX480 SLI |
29'283 |
222.90 % |
| nVidia GTX 295 SLI |
29'128 |
221.72 % |
| ASUS EAH6990 (880 MHz / 5'000 MHz) |
28'525 |
217.13 % |
| ASUS EAH6990 (830 MHz / 5'000 MHz) |
28'397 |
216.16 % |
| ASUS ARES 5870X2 2DIS 4GD5 |
25'544 |
194.44 % |
| MSI GTX 580 Lightning |
25'091 |
190.99 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 Matrix Platinum |
24'515 |
186.61 % |
| ASUS ENGTX 580 |
23'628 |
179.85 % |
| ASUS GTX 590 |
23'588 |
179.55 % |
| NVIDIA GTX 590 |
23'353 |
177.77 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 DirectCUII |
23'440 |
178.43 % |
| ASUS GTX 570 DirectCUII |
20'914 |
159.20 % |
| ZOTAC GTX 285 SLI |
20'715 |
157.68 % |
| ASUS ENGTX 560 TI 448 DCII/2DIS/1280MD5 |
20'203 |
153.79 % |
| ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII |
20'039 |
152.54 % |
| ZOTAC GTX 275 1792MB SLI |
19'960 |
151.93 % |
| ASUS EAH6970 2GB |
19'835 |
150.99 % |
| ASUS EAH5970 |
19'789 |
150.63 % |
| ASUS GTX 560 Ti DirectCUII Top |
18'944 |
144.20 % |
| Gigabyte HD5870 Super Overclock |
18'745 |
142.68 % |
| Zotac GTX 480 |
18'345 |
139.64 % |
| MSI HD 5870 Lightning |
18'095 |
137.74 % |
| nVidia GTX 295 |
17'857 |
135.93 % |
| ASUS EAH6950 2GB |
17'679 |
134.57 % |
| Gigabyte GTX460 Super Overclock |
15'755 |
119.93 % |
| ASUS EAH5870 |
15'858 |
120.71 % |
| ASUS EAH6850 DirectCU |
14'866 |
113.16 % |
| EVGA GTX 460 EE |
14'002 |
106.58 % |
| ASUS GTX 470 |
13'753 |
104.68 % |
| ASUS EAH5850 |
13'137 |
100.00 % |
| ASUS GTX285 Matrix |
12'156 |
92.53 % |
| MSI GTX 275 Lightning |
11'337 |
86.29 % |
| ASUS GTX 550 Ti DirectCU Top |
10'717 |
81.58 % |
| ASUS EAH6770 DC SL/2DI/1GD5 |
9'641 |
73.39 % |
| ASUS EAH3870X2 |
8'292 |
63.12 % |
| ASUS ENGTS250 DK |
6'722 |
51.17 % |
| EVGA 8800 GT 512MB |
5'328 |
40.55 % |
| ASUS ENGT440 |
4'782 |
36.40 % |
| Zotac 9600 GT ECO |
3'878 |
29.52 % |
| ASUS ENGT430 |
3'709 |
28.23 % |
| ASUS EAH5550 |
2'863 |
21.79 % |
| |
more is better |
Discuss this article in the forums
ASUS GTX 580 Matrix Platinum 