Review: ASUS Sabertooth X79

Published by Marc Büchel on 17.11.11
Page:
« 1 ... 9 10 11 (12) 13 14 15 »

Games

Crysis 800 x 600, low details

Crysis is still one of the games which has very high system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API, High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX9 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.

Crysis DirectX9 (800 x 600 low details)

Rating

fps Percent
ASUS P9X79 Pro No Review 146.665 104.85 %
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme No Review 146.240 104.54 %
ASUS P9X79 Deluxe No Review 145.935 104.32 %
ASUS Sabertooth X79 No Review 145.855 104.27 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4-M No Review 143.575 102.64 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4 No Review 143.460 102.56 %
Intel DX79SI No Review 139.885 100.00 %
  more is better


Resident Evil 800 x 600, low details

Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX9 benchmark we can again show CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.

Resident Evil DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details)

Rating

fps Percent
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme No Review 200.2 102.61 %
ASUS P9X79 Pro No Review 198.8 101.90 %
ASUS Sabertooth X79 No Review 198.6 101.79 %
ASUS P9X79 Deluxe No Review 198.2 101.59 %
Intel DX79SI No Review 195.1 100.00 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4-M No Review 193.8 99.33 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4 No Review 192.2 98.51 %
  more is better


Street Fighter 4 800 x 600, low details

Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.

Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low details)

Rating

fps Percent
ASRock X79 Extreme4-M No Review 823.86 102.87 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4 No Review 820.72 102.47 %
ASUS P9X79 Deluxe No Review 813.27 101.54 %
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme No Review 812.27 101.42 %
ASUS Sabertooth X79 No Review 808.62 100.96 %
Intel DX79SI No Review 800.90 100.00 %
ASUS P9X79 Pro No Review 792.67 98.97 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 10 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 11 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 12 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 13 - Power Consumption
Page 6 - Test setup Page 14 - Performance Rating
Page 7 - Futuremark Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - PC Mark 07  



Discuss this article in the forums




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Liebe Mainboardhersteller: Jetzt ist's genug! Review: ASUS P9X79 Deluxe Next article
comments powered by Disqus

Review: ASUS Sabertooth X79 - Motherboards > Intel > X79 - Reviews - ocaholic