ASUS Rampage V Edition 10 Review

Published by Marc Büchel on 25.07.16
Page:
« 1 ... 11 12 13 (14) 15 16 17 ... 27 »

SiSoft Sandra 2

Memory bandwidth

SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - Integer GB/sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 46.61 104.74 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 46.59 104.70 %
ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 (Transfer Express) 46.58 104.67 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 46.57 104.65 %
ASUS X99-A 46.55 104.61 %
ASRock X99 WS 46.52 104.54 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 46.48 104.45 %
ASUS Sabertooth X99 46.00 103.37 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 45.87 103.08 %
ASUS Rampage V Edition 10 45.12 101.39 %
MSI X99A Godlike Gaming 44.77 100.61 %
MSI X99S MPower 44.52 100.04 %
EVGA X99 Classified 44.50 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-Ultra Gaming 44.00 98.88 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 43.23 97.15 %
ASRock X99E-ITX/ac 25.28 56.81 %
more is better


SiSoft Sandra - Memory bandwidth - floating point GB/sec Percent
ASRock X99 OC Formula 47.73 106.07 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 47.68 105.96 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 47.20 104.89 %
ASRock X99 WS 47.15 104.78 %
MSI X99A Godlike Gaming 46.72 103.82 %
ASUS Sabertooth X99 46.71 103.80 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 46.61 103.58 %
Gigabyte X99-Ultra Gaming 46.61 103.58 %
ASUS X99-A 45.92 102.04 %
ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 (Transfer Express) 46.20 102.67 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 45.69 101.53 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 45.57 101.27 %
MSI X99S MPower 45.55 101.22 %
ASUS Rampage V Edition 10 45.07 100.16 %
EVGA X99 Classified 45.00 100.00 %
ASRock X99E-ITX/ac 25.63 56.96 %
more is better


Memory latency

SiSoft Sandra - Memory latency ns Percent
ASRock X99 WS 27.4 100.00 %
EVGA X99 Classified 27.4 100.00 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 27.6 99.28 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 27.6 99.28 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 27.7 98.92 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 27.9 98.21 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 27.8 98.56 %
ASUS Rampage V Edition 10 28.4 96.48 %
ASUS Sabertooth X99 28.6 95.80 %
Gigabyte X99-Ultra Gaming 28.6 95.80 %
ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 (Transfer Express) 28.6 95.80 %
ASRock X99E-ITX/ac 28.7 95.47 %
MSI X99A Godlike Gaming 28.7 95.47 %
MSI X99S MPower 28.8 96.00 %
ASUS X99-A 29.0 94.48 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 30.0 91.33 %
less is better more is better


Memory and cache access

SiSoft Sandra - Memory and cache access GB/sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Edition 10 352.15 104.94 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 351.69 104.81 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 351.65 104.79 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 351.58 104.77 %
ASUS Sabertooth X99 349.18 104.06 %
MSI X99A Godlike Gaming 349.18 104.06 %
ASRock X99 WS 348.54 103.87 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 347.68 103.61 %
ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 (Transfer Express) 347.55 103.57 %
MSI X99S MPower 347.50 103.56 %
ASUS X99-A 347.47 103.55 %
Gigabyte X99-Ultra Gaming 344.51 102.67 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 339.12 101.06 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 336.21 100.19 %
EVGA X99 Classified 335.56 100.00 %
ASRock X99E-ITX/ac 290.13 86.46 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article Gigabyte X99 Ultra Gaming Review ASUS X99 Deluxe II Review Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS Rampage V Edition 10 Review - Motherboards > Intel > X99 - Reviews - ocaholic