Gigabyte X170-Extreme ECC Review
Published by Marc Büchel on 10.05.16Page:
3D Mark 11
| 3D Mark 11 Total | Percent | |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Impact | 16'473 | 100.54% |
| ASRock Z170 OC Formula | 16'441 | 100.35% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme | 16'436 | 100.32% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-SQ | 16'428 | 100.27% |
| MSI Z170 Gaming M7 | 16'425 | 100.25% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger | 16'423 | 100.24% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme Assembly | 16'419 | 100.21% |
| Gigabyte X170-Extreme ECC | 16'417 | 100.20% |
| ASUS Z170-A | 16'416 | 100.20% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Gene | 16'406 | 100.13% |
| MSI Z170A Xpower Gaming Titanium Edition | 16'397 | 100.08% |
| ASUS Z170 Pro Gaming | 16'389 | 100.03% |
| ASUS Z170 Deluxe | 16'384 | 100.00% |
| MSI Z170I Gaming Pro AC | 16'374 | 99.93% |
| Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming G1 | 16'366 | 99.89% |
| ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ | 16'377 | 99.96% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-OCE | 16'371 | 99.92% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Hero | 16'357 | 99.83% |
| more is better | ||
CPU
| 3D Mark 11 Physics | Percent | |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger | 11'597 | 101.27% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-OCE | 11'555 | 100.90% |
| ASUS Z170 Pro Gaming | 11'549 | 100.85% |
| ASRock Z170 OC Formula | 11'548 | 100.84% |
| Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming G1 | 11'548 | 100.84% |
| ASUS Z170-A | 11'531 | 100.69% |
| Supermicro C7Z170-SQ | 11'531 | 100.69% |
| Gigabyte X170-Extreme ECC | 11'523 | 100.62% |
| MSI Z170 Gaming M7 | 11'519 | 100.59% |
| ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ | 11'502 | 100.44% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme | 11'485 | 100.29% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme Assembly | 11'479 | 100.23% |
| MSI Z170I Gaming Pro AC | 11'479 | 100.23% |
| MSI Z170A Xpower Gaming Titanium Edition | 11'477 | 100.22% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Gene | 11'459 | 100.06% |
| ASUS Z170 Deluxe | 11'452 | 100.00% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Impact | 11'401 | 99.55% |
| ASUS Maximus VIII Hero | 11'357 | 99.17% |
| more is better | ||
comments powered by Disqus
|
|