Sort by:
Title (
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
)
Sites currently sorted by: Rating (Lowest Score to Highest Score)
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
) Sites currently sorted by: Rating (Lowest Score to Highest Score)
Every other review site today will be harping on, and rightfully so. about how AMD's Trinity Radeon cores crushes the competition's HD2500/4000 in gaming graphics performance at a budget Core i3-ish price point. We at VR-Zone reckon that the average Trinity A-series APU buyer probably still has some aspirations in life, and a desire to play games smoothly on their Full HD displays. So what happens when we throw in a mid-range discrete GPU like the US$240 HD7870 (Pitcairn) into the mix? Will we see crippling CPU bottlenecks?
Right on track, well after Ivy Bridge, AMD has released their second generation of Accelerated Processing Units in the form of the Trinity series A10-5800K and the A8-5600K. Last week, we brought you a preview of these two APUs just to give you a taste of their gaming performance and some of their specifications. Today, at Benchmark Reviews, we are going in detail for a full work-over of the A8-5600K APU.
If you plan on using a dedicated graphics card, the FX-8350, FX-8320 and FX-6300 aren't bad options. With Intel you get an integrated GPU that you pay for but don't use if you have a separate graphics card. In the AMD FX processors every single transistor is used by the CPU, which clearly has a positive effect with multi-threaded software. Don't get us wrong, Intel still makes the world's fastest processor and AMD can't even get close. But if you have a dedicated video card, then the new AMD FX processors give you a lot of bang for your buck.
Aktualisierte Performance- & Preis-Übersicht AMD Llano & Trinity vs. Intel Core i3 & Pentium G @ PCGH
Technic3D hat die AMD A10-5700, Intel Core i5-3470 und i3-3240 CPUs im Vergleich. Wer in diesem Preissegment das Rennen macht, steht im folgenden Review.
Technic3D hat die AMD FX-4350 CPU im Test. In der Mittelklasse versucht AMD mit neuen Modellen die Leistung anzuheben. Ob dies gegen die Konkurrenz gelingt steht im folgenden Kurztest.
AMD möchte zurück in die Köpfe der Enthusiasten: Mit dem FX-9590 präsentierte der Hersteller just ein Modell, das mit bis zu 5 GHz arbeitet. Da Testmuster des Taktwunders nicht in Sicht sind, die Leistung des "Centurion" jedoch ein heiß diskutiertes Thema ist, wagt PC Games Hardware eine Simulation des FX-9590.
Dernièrement nous avons vérifié les performances de l'APU A10-6700 d'AMD et nous devons le dire, ce dernier nous avait séduit de par ses performances CPU intéressantes et sa carte graphique plus que suffisante pour bien des tâches. Aujourd'hui, nous testons la version A10-6800K, celle-là même qui peut tourner à plus de 4.0 GHz et surtout qui permet l'OC. A découvrir sans plus attendre dans nos colonnes.
Today Intel introduced the world to “Bay Trail,” Intel’s first 22nm system-on-a-chip (SoC) for mobile devices. Bay Trail is a complete redesign of the Intel Atom processor series and offers performance that comes closer to Intel’s mainstream processors lines. Since Bay Trail is based on the company’s new low-power, high-performance Silvermont microarchitecture, you can expect to see roughly two to three times the performance of the current “Clover Trail” Atom with better battery life! Intel hasn’t had too many design wins in the tablet market with Clover Trail, but Intel is starting fresh and has high hopes to Bay Trail to capture a significant chunk of the Android and Windows tablet designs and even a fair number of 2 in 1 devices.
Today is NDA day for Intel's brand new Z97 platform. Sadly there will be no launch article on MadShrimps; simple reason is because we have experienced some issues with the current Haswell refresh processors on our Z97 testbeds. MadShrimps has tested Z97 with the 4770K and did a comparison between Z87 and 297. That data is ready and was ready to be published, however the outcome we got when briefly testing the i7 4790 from the brand new refresh range is concerning to say the least. Time for a brief explanation of what happened today...
execution time : 0.132 sec