Sort by:
Title (
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
)
Sites currently sorted by: Rating (Lowest Score to Highest Score)
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
) Sites currently sorted by: Rating (Lowest Score to Highest Score)
We have been waiting for months, but Bulldozer is finally here. The weeks leading up to the launch of the new FX line of processors hasn't been the best for AMD with a large amount of leaks that haven't put the new FX-8150 in the best light. Today, though, leaks don't matter; unofficial results don't matter. We've got all the latest drivers, the latest BIOS updates and it's time to see what Bulldozer can do. There's no denying that AMD are going to have a tough fight on their hands, though. AMD have stated that the new platform is only designed to compete against the current crop of Sandy Bridge CPUs.
The Corsair CMGTX4 and CMGTX7 were two of the fastest RAM kits available at the time; they carried with them a huge price tag and 'till today, the speed on the GTX4 kit is just insane. Both kits are dual channel, but neither would achieve their rated speeds. While overclocking on the Z68 platform is great, its memory overclocking is limited and actually not as strong as the older P55 when it comes to raw MHz. Having unfortunately admitted defeat on these two kits, I never got around to actually looking at them, because we couldn't get the default speeds.
After the hectic week of testing this brand new 8 core CPU from Advanced Micro Design, it's time to go a bit deeper. In this review we are gonna retest the Bulldozer CPU versus it's main rivals. Being AMD's own Thuban 1090T, Intels 2600K and the almighty Gulftown 990X CPU. Mainly because our test suite had to be slightly updated to give the new Zambezi architecture a shot to maybe show it's true potential. But most important to show some people the real deal. I've myself read through a few articles on AMD's latest flagship. To be honest some reviews made me wonder if they were really done or just a copy paste of the marketing slides. It was also kind of funny to see some renown websites include completely GPU bottlenecked game benchmarks. Kinda hard to tell the importance of the CPU part don't you think ? Even if they call it real world scenarios, it still made my eyebrows frown as they hardly used any game tests in older reviews. Why now include them ? So without boring you too much with my frustrations, let's get it on...
Vor knapp drei Jahren stellte der Chipgigant Intel eine Oberklasse-Plattform auf Basis des Sockel LGA1366 samt X58-Chipsatz und den dazugehörigen Core-i7-900-Prozessoren vor, die in Sachen Performance zum Marktstart ihres gleichen suchte. Doch mittlerweile konnte die innovative Sandy-Bridge-Architektur - die Anfang dieses Jahres zusammen mit dem Sockel LGA1155 das Licht der Öffentlichkeit erblickte - die Performance-Krone an sich reißen. Es wird also höchste Zeit für eine neue High-End-Option: Deshalb schickt Intel heute offiziell Sandy Bridge Extreme ins Rennen, um auch Enthusiasten wieder eine kompromisslose Auswahl an entsprechend leistungsfähigen Komponenten bereitstellen zu können. Wir schauen uns das Flaggschiff in Form des Core i7-3960X genauer an und werfen auch einen Blick auf den Sockel LGA2011 und den X79-PCH.
Am heutigen Tage hat Microsoft für das Betriebssystem Windows 7 einen Hotfix veröffentlicht, der die Probleme beheben soll, die sein jüngstes OS in Kombination mit einem AMD FX-Prozessor hat, die Lasten optimal auf die in Modulbauweise gefertigten Kerne zu verteilen, sodass am Ende die optimale Leistung dabei herauskommt. Bereits im Vorfeld der AMD FX "Bulldozer" Präsentation hatte AMD darauf hingewiesen, dass der Scheduler von Windows 7, der die Prozesse bzw. die Threads auf die vorhandenen Kerne verteilt, suboptimal arbeitet für den Bulldozer. Nun soll es ein Patch richten, doch der versagt kläglich...
Intel's high-end LGA2011 platform has been out since November 2011 and since the platforms introduction there have only been two SNB-E processor choices available, the six-core Intel Core i7-3960X and Core i7-3930K. These hexa-core processors are costly as they run over $600 and that is more than most want to spend. All that changes this month with the introduction of the Intel Core i7-3820 that is priced at just $285. Read on to see how this processor performs!
Since the start of this year Intel's new generation processors have beenthe topic of discussion for many hardware enthusiasts. The new Ivy Bridge processors, or the third generation Core processors as Intel prefers to call them, are finally officially launched today. Hardware.Info extensively tested three of the new desktop processors: the Core i7 3770K, the Core i5 3570K and the Core i5 3550. We compared them to almost every current generation desktop processor.
heute wurden die Intel Core i7-3770K, Core i5-3570K, Core i5-3550, Core i7-3820QM und einige weitere 22nm Ivy Bridge Prozessoren vorgestellt und bereits umfangreich getestet.
Today we weren't able to bring our Intel Core i7 3770K 'Ivy Bridge' processor beyond 4.7GHz with complete stability. This is a little disappointing, but not the end of the world. We have to keep in mind that processor frequency isn't quite as important as it once was. Where the problem seems to reside, is in the temperatures...
Zoostorm supply many of their computers without an operating system installed which will prove valuable if you already own a license. Today we are going to look at a Zoostorm PC which is targeted at low-budget home users who want a capable multimedia system. This system incorporates an AMD A6-3500 triple core APU featuring integrated AMD Radeon HD 6530 graphics.
execution time : 0.151 sec