ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum In-Game Performance

Published by Christian Ney on 08.01.14
Page:
« 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 7 ... 16 »

BattleField 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 4xMSAA, Ultra, SSAO Average FPS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 GHz Edition 104.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 101.0
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 99.4
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 OC V2 98.8
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 96.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 90.4
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 78.4
AMD Radeon R9 280X 76.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 76.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 72.8
AMD Radeon HD 7970 71.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 66.0
AMD Radeon HD 6990 65.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 62.0
AMD Radeon R9 270X 58.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 55.8
AMD Radeon R9 270 55.0
AMD Radeon HD 7870 54.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 50.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 48.6
AMD Radeon HD 7850 44.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 44.2
AMD Radeon HD 7790 36.6
AMD Radeon HD 6970 35.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 33.2
AMD Radeon HD 5870 32.6
AMD Radeon HD 6950 32.0
AMD Radeon HD 6870 29.8
AMD Radeon HD 5850 26.6
More is better






Page 1 - Test Setup Page 9 - DIRT Showdown
Page 2 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 10 - Far Cry 3
Page 3 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - BattleField 3 Page 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 5 - Borderlands 2 Page 13 - Metro: Last Light
Page 6 - Bioshock Infinite Page 14 - GTA V
Page 7 - Crysis 3 Page 15 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Page 16 - Performance/Price & Performance/Watt



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC In-Game Performance PowerColor Radeon R9 280X TurboDuo OC In-Game Performance Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum In-Game Performance - Graphics cards > Charts - Reviews - ocaholic