ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 Review

Published by Marc Büchel on 14.02.13
Page:
« 1 ... 5 6 7 (8) 9 10 11 ... 14 »

Futuremark

3DMark06

3DMark 06 is getting older these days. Therefore if you are using really powerful graphic cards you will hit CPU limitation which means that the graphic card isn't the bottleneck in the system. This is also the reason why in recent high-end desktop systems 3DMark 06 scales nicely with the CPU and the graphic card has much less influence on the scores.

Total

3DMark 06 Total Marks Percent
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 17'542 102.25 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z 17'490 101.95 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 17'471 101.83 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo 17'421 101.54 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 17'267 100.65 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula 17'262 100.62 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 17'256 100.58 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX 17'164 100.05 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 17'156 100.00 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 17'053 99.40 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 17'054 99.40 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 16'866 98.31 %
  Higher is better


CPU

3DMark 06 CPU Marks Percent
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 5'839 103.11 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo 5'835 103.04 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 5'803 102.47 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 5'802 102.45 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula 5'792 102.28 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z 5'781 102.08 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 5'746 101.46 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 5'693 100.81 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 5'663 100.00 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 5'663 100.00 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX 5'657 99.89 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 5'647 99.71 %
  Higher is better

 

3DMark Vantage

3DMark Vantage is able to squeeze nearly everything out of a recent system. Therefore the feature liste is also pretty long: DirectX10, FP16-HDR, motion blur, parallax occlusion mapping, GPU-physics simulation and different shader effects are being used to even make recent high-end systems struggle.

Total

3DMark Vantage Total Marks Percent
ASUS M5A99X Evo 13'009 100.69 %
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 12'960 100.31 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z 12'979 100.46 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 12'969 100.38 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 12'945 100.19 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 12'924 100.03 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 12'920 100.00 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 12'884 99.72 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 12'862 99.55 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula 12'857 99.51 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 12'792 99.01 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX 12'760 98.76 %
  Higher is better


CPU

3DMark Vantage CPU Marks Percent
ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme 16'747 103.21 %
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P 16'724 103.07 %
ASUS M5A99X Evo 16'657 102.66 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 16'550 102.00 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z 16'643 102.57 %
ASUS Crosshair V Formula 16'592 102.26 %
ASUS M4A78T-E 16'543 101.95 %
ASRock M3A790GXH/128M 16'527 101.86 %
DFI LanParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 16'390 101.01 %
ECS A890GXM-A2 16'286 100.37 %
ASUS M4A78-HTPC (DDR2-800-CL4) 16'226 100.00 %
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX 16'194 99.80 %
  Higher is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - Futuremark
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 3 - Features Page 10 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 4 - Layout Page 11 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 12 - Games
Page 6 - BIOS Page 13 - Overclocking
Page 7 - Test setup Page 14 - Conclusion



Discuss this article in the forums




Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 Preview ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R3.0 Review Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 Review - Motherboards > AMD > 990 - Reviews - ocaholic