Review: Biostar TZ77XE4 T Overclocker

Published by Marc Büchel on 03.04.12
Page:
« 1 ... 8 9 10 (11) 12 13 »

Games

Crysis 800 x 600, low details

Crysis is still one of the games which has very high system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API, High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX9 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.


Crysis DirectX9 (800 x 600 low details)

Rating

fps Percent
ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
No Review
97.29 112.27 %
Biostar TZ77XE4 T-Overclocker
No Review
97.22 112.19 %
ASRock Z77 Extreme 6
No Review
95.34 110.02 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7
90.16 104.04 %
ASUS Maximus IV Extreme 90.16 104.04 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67
89.80 103.62 %
MSI P67A-GD65
89.75 103.57 %
ASUS P8P67-M EVO
No Review
89.05 102.76 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67
89.01 102.71 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
86.66 100.00 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4
86.61 99.94 %
ASRock Extreme7 Gen3
No Review
84.95 98.27 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional
84.64 97.67 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe
No Review
84.64 97.67 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro
84.26 97.23 %
ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z
84.13 97.08 %
ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z
No Review
84.05 96.99 %
Gigabyte Z68X-UD5-B3
83.88 96.79 %
Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3
83.43 96.27 %
Gigabyte Z68X-UD7-B3
83.42 96.26 %
Intel DP67BG
83.27 96.09 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo
81.77 94.36 %
Intel mATX DH67BL
No Review
81.22 93.72 %
ASUS P8B WS (Memory @ 1333 MHz
80.55 92.95 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro (with Lucid Virtu)
78.94 91.09 %
ASUS Sabertooth Z77
No Review
77.20 89.08 %
  more is better


Resident Evil 800 x 600, low details

Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX9 benchmark we can again show CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.


Resident Evil DirectX9 (800 x 600 low details)

Rating

fps Percent
ASRock Extreme7 Gen3
No Review
176.7 108.21 %
ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z
No Review
175.5 107.47 %
Gigabyte Z68X-UD7-B3
175.1 107.23 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional
174.8 107.04 %
Gigabyte Z68X-UD5-B3
174.5 106.86 %
ASUS Maximus IV Extreme 174.5 106.86 %
Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3
174.4 106.80 %
ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z
174.1 106.61 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro
173.4 106.18 %
Intel DP67BG
172.6 105.70 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7
171.6 105.08 %
ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
No Review
169.9 104.04 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4
169.5 103.80 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe
No Review
169.4 103.74 %
Biostar TZ77XE4 T-Overclocker
No Review
168.3 103.06 %
Intel mATX DH67BL
No Review
167.3 102.45 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67
169.4 103.74 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67
169.3 103.67 %
MSI P67A-GD65
168.5 103.18 %
ASUS Sabertooth Z77
No Review
167.3 102.45 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro (with Lucid Virtu)
167.0 102.27 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo
166.7 102.08 %
ASUS P8B WS (Memory @ 1333 MHz
167.4 102.51 %
ASUS P8P67-M EVO
No Review
166.5 101.96 %
ASRock Z77 Extreme 6
No Review
164.6 100.80 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
163.3 100.00 %
  more is better


Street Fighter 4 800 x 600, low details

Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.


Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low details)

Rating

fps Percent
ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
No Review
592.61 104.00 %
ASUS Sabertooth Z77
No Review
591.09 103.74 %
Biostar TZ77XE4 T-Overclocker
No Review
588.56 103.29 %
ASRock Z77 Extreme 6
No Review
584.87 102.61 %
ASUS Maximus IV Extreme 573.97 100.73 %
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
569.79 100.00 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD7
569.21 99.90 %
ASUS Sabertooth P67
568.30 99.74 %
MSI P67A-GD65
568.25 99.73 %
Gigabyte P67A-UD4
568.00 99.69 %
ASUS P8P67-M EVO
No Review
567.88 99.66 %
MSI Big Bang Marshal P67
563.66 98.92 %
ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional
550.85 96.68 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro
547.15 96.03 %
ASUS P8H67-M Evo
543.94 95.46 %
ASUS P8H67-I Deluxe
No Review
543.77 95.43 %
Intel mATX DH67BL
No Review
541.17 94.98 %
Intel DP67BG
538.99 94.59 %
ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z
529.11 92.86 %
ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z
No Review
523.85 91.94 %
Gigabyte Z68X-UD5-B3
523.83 91.93 %
Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3
523.70 91.91 %
ASRock Extreme7 Gen3
No Review
523.18 91.82 %
Gigabyte Z68X-UD7-B3
514.97 90.38 %
ASUS P8B WS (Memory @ 1333 MHz
514.94 90.37 %
ASUS P8Z68-V Pro (with Lucid Virtu, only integrated graphics active)   163.34 28.67 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Review: ASRock Z77 Extreme 6 with Sandy Bridge Preview: Gigabyte G1.Sniper 3 Next article
comments powered by Disqus

Review: Biostar TZ77XE4 T Overclocker - Motherboards > Intel > Z77 - Reviews - ocaholic