Review: ASUS HD 7950 DirectCU II Top - Tahiti Pro on steroids

Published by Marc Büchel on 31.01.12
Page:
« 1 2 3 4 (5) 6 7 8 ... 14 »

3DMark 11

3DMark 11 is Futuremarks latest benchmark for the entire graphical subsystem. The benchmark uses DirectX 11 and it supports all recent features which can possibly generate high load on a GPU. Therefore you find tessellation, compute shader calculations, divers lighting effects and different depth of filed animations. Following we publish values regarding the performance preset of 3DMark 11.




3DMark 11 Total Score Percent
AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire 8'772 245.23 %
ASUS EAH6990 (880 MHz / 5'000 MHz) 8'625 241.12 %
ASUS EAH6990 (830 MHz / 5'000 MHz) 8'370 233.99 %
ASUS GTX 590 8'123 227.09 %
NVIDIA GTX 590 8'043 224.85 %
XFX Radeon HD 7970 Double Dissipation 7'201 201.31 %
ASUS HD 7950 DirectCU II Top 6'636 185.52 %
ASUS GTX 580 Matrix Platinum 6'356 177.69 %
MSI GTX 580 Lightning 6'048 160.08 %
Palit GTX 580 SLI (3DMark11 wasn't supported in SLI by nVidia Drivers) 5'841 163.29 %
ASUS GTX 580 DirectCUII 5'988 167.40 %
ASUS GTX 580 5'803 162.23 %
ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII 5'335 149.15 %
ASUS GTX 570 DirectCUII 5'273 147.14 %
ASUS ENGTX 560 TI 448 DCII/2DIS/1280MD5 5'212 145.71 %
ASUS EAH6970 2GB 5'175 144.67 %
Zotac GTX480 SLI (3DMark11 wasn't supported in SLI by nVidia Drivers) 5'046 141.07 %
Zotac GTX 480 4'922 137.60 %
ASUS EAH6950 2GB 4'606 128.77 %
ASUS GTX 560 Ti DirectCUII Top 4'551 127.23 %
Gigabyte GTX460 Super Overclock 3'754  104.95 %
ASUS EAH6850 3'577 100.00 %
EVGA GTX 460 EE 3'404 95.16 %
ASUS GTX 550 Ti DirectCU Top 2'717 75.96 %
ASUS EAH6770 DC SL/2DI/1GD5 2'713 75.85 %
AMD Radeon HD 6570 1'571 43.92 %
ASUS ENGT440 1'327 37.10 %
ASUS ENGT430 1'075 30.05 %
ASUS EAH5550 1'017 28.43 %
  more is better


3DMark 11 GPU Score Percent
AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire 10'189 305.52 %
ASUS EAH6990 (880 MHz / 5'000 MHz) 9'977 299.16 %
ASUS EAH6990 (830 MHz / 5'000 MHz) 9'571 286.98 %
ASUS GTX 590 8'914 267.29 %
NVIDIA GTX 590 8'854 265.49 %
AMD Radeon HD 6570 6'779 203.27 %
XFX Radeon HD 7970 Double Dissipation 7'797 233.79 %
ASUS HD 7950 DirectCU II Top 6'800 203.90 %
ASUS GTX 580 Matrix Platinum 6'314 189.32 %
MSI GTX 580 Lightning 5'952 178.47 %
ASUS GTX 580 DirectCUII 5'872 176.07 %
ASUS GTX 580 5'812 174.27 %
Palit ENGTX 580 SLI (3DMark11 wasn't supported in SLI by nVidia Drivers) 5'697  170.82 %
ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII 5'132 153.88 %
ASUS GTX 570 DirectCUII 5'082 152.38 %
ASUS GTX 570 DirectCUII 5'007 150.13 %
ASUS EAH6970 2GB 4'949 148.40 %
Zotac GTX480 SLI (3DMark11 wasn't supported in SLI by nVidia Drivers) 4'870 146.03 %
Zotac GTX 480 4'802 143.99 %
ASUS GTX 560 Ti DirectCUII Top 4'341 130.16 %
ASUS EAH6950 2GB 4'108 123.18 %
Gigabyte GTX460 Super Overclock 3'562  106.81 %
ASUS EAH6850 3'335 100.00 %
EVGA GTX 460 EE 3'148 94.39 %
ASUS EAH6770 DC SL/2DI/1GD5 2'460 73.76 %
ASUS GTX 550 Ti DirectCU Top 2'440 73.16 %
ASUS ENGT440 1'160 34.78 %
ASUS ENGT430 937 28.10 %
ASUS EAH5550 882 26.45 %
  more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - Stone Giant
Page 2 - Technical Data / Specifications Page 9 - World in Conflict
Page 3 - Preview / Delivery Page 10 - Resident Evil 5
Page 4 - Testing conditions Page 11 - Call of Juarez
Page 5 - 3D Mark 11 Page 12 - Far Cry 2
Page 6 - 3D Mark Vantage Page 13 - Overclocking
Page 7 - Unigine Heaven Page 14 - Conclusion



Discuss this article in the forums




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Review: ASUS EAH6770 DC SL/2DI/1GD5 Review: XFX R7970 Double Dissipation Next article
comments powered by Disqus

Review: ASUS HD 7950 DirectCU II Top - Tahiti Pro on steroids - Graphics cards > Reviews > AMD - Reviews - ocaholic