Prestazioni 2D / 3D / Archiviazione
Prestazioni 2D
| Benchmark/Software |
Sistema di riferimento |
MIFCOM Savage GTX 1080 Ti |
Differenza |
Sintetici |
| PCMark 8 Creative |
6'362 Points |
6'358 Points |
-0.06 % |
| Fire Strike Physix |
14'279 Marks |
14'482 Marks |
1.42 % |
| 3DMark 11 Physix |
11'835 Marks |
11'963 Marks |
1.08 % |
| SiSoft Sandra Arithmetics Dhrystone |
209.19 GIPS |
215.11 GIPS |
2.83 % |
| SiSoft Sandra Arithmetics Whetstone |
123.14 GFLOPS |
127.88 GFLOPS |
3.85 % |
| SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Integer |
559.36 MPixel/sec |
560.53 MPixel/sec |
0.21 % |
| SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Floating Point |
550.75 MPixel/sec |
551.75 MPixel/sec |
0.18 % |
| SiSoft Sandra Cryptography AES |
12.99 GB/sec |
12.99 GB/sec |
0.00 % |
| SiSoft Sandra Cryptography SHA |
6.48 GB/sec |
6.50 GB/sec |
0.31 % |
| Black Hole |
22'236 Points |
22'411 Points |
0.79 % |
Real-World |
| WinRAR |
11'078 KB/sec |
11'063 KB/sec |
-0.14 % |
| 7Zip |
27'766 MIPS |
27'583 MIPS |
-0.66 % |
| Frybench |
221 sec |
218 sec |
1.36 % |
| Cinebench R15 |
980 Points |
971 Points |
-0.92 % |
| Handbreak h.264 |
18.31 fps |
18.11 fps |
-1.09 % |
| Handbreak h.265 |
12.47 fps |
12.33 fps |
-1.12 % |
| Photoshop |
11.5 sec |
11.3 sec |
-1.74 % |
| Microsoft Excel |
343 sec |
339 sec |
1.17 % |
La differenza media tra le prestazioni ottenute dal sistema di MIFCOM e il nostro sistema di riferimento è di circa il 2%. In altre parole il sistema è ben costruito e configurato.
Prestazioni in 3D
| Benchmark/Spiel |
Sistema di riferimento |
MIFCOM Savage GTX 1080 Ti |
Differenza |
Sintetici |
| 3DMark Time Spy - GPU Score |
9'268 |
9'212 |
0.60 % |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - GPU Score |
28'806 |
28'584 |
0.80 % |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme - GPU Score |
13'678 |
13'582 |
0.70 % |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra - GPU Score |
6'533 |
6'469 |
0.98 % |
| 3DMark VRMark |
181.62 |
181.26 |
0.20 % |
| SteamVR Performance Test |
11.00 |
11.00 |
0.00 % |
Real-World |
| ArmA 3 - 1080p (FullHD) |
48.00 |
48.00 |
0.00 % |
| ArmA 3 - 1440p (WHQD) |
44.00 |
44.00 |
0.00 % |
| ArmA 3 - 2160p (UHD) |
40.00 |
40.00 |
0.00 % |
| |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX11- 1080p (FullHD) |
61.60 |
60.97 |
1.02 % |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX11 - 1440p (WHQD) |
61.20 |
60.58 |
1.02 % |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX11 - 2160p (UHD) |
56.90 |
56.31 |
1.04 % |
| |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 1080p (FullHD) |
73.20 |
73.10 |
0.14 % |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 1440p (WHQD) |
76.00 |
75.90 |
0.13 % |
| Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 2160p (UHD) |
65.80 |
65.70 |
0.15 % |
| |
| Doom - 1080p (FullHD) |
130.45 |
130.40 |
0.04 % |
| Doom - 1440p (WHQD) |
130.35 |
130.35 |
0.00 % |
| Doom - 2160p (UHD) |
85.50 |
85.45 |
0.06 % |
| |
| Far Cry Primal - 1080p (FullHD) |
115.00 |
114.00 |
0.87 % |
| Far Cry Primal - 1440p (WHQD) |
98.00 |
97.00 |
1.02 % |
| Far Cry Primal - 2160p (UHD) |
56.00 |
55.00 |
1.79 % |
| |
| GTA V - 1080p (FullHD) |
112.16 |
111.89 |
0.24 % |
| GTA V - 1440p (WHQD) |
73.74 |
73.44 |
0.41 % |
| GTA V - 2160p (UHD) |
36.86 |
36.44 |
1.14 % |
| |
| Rainbox Six Siege - 1080p (FullHD) |
154.80 |
154.30 |
0.32 % |
| Rainbox Six Siege - 1440p (WHQD) |
99.90 |
99.70 |
0.20 % |
| Rainbox Six Siege - 2160p (UHD) |
50.20 |
50.10 |
0.20 % |
| |
| Total War Warhammer DX11 - 1080p (FullHD) |
149.80 |
149.70 |
0.07 % |
| Total War Warhammer DX11- 1440p (WHQD) |
120.50 |
120.50 |
0.00 % |
| Total War Warhammer DX11 - 2160p (UHD) |
69.30 |
69.30 |
0.00 % |
| |
| Total War Warhammer DX12 - 1080p (FullHD) |
110.90 |
110.80 |
0.09 % |
| Total War Warhammer DX12 - 1440p (WHQD) |
98.50 |
98.40 |
0.09 % |
| Total War Warhammer DX12 - 2160p (UHD) |
64.10 |
64.00 |
0.16 % |
| |
| XCOM 2 - 1080p (FullHD) |
78.82 |
78.54 |
0.36 % |
| XCOM 2 - 1440p (WHQD) |
56.43 |
56.11 |
0.57 % |
| XCOM 2 - 2160p (UHD) |
30.72 |
30.43 |
0.94 % |
Anche per le prestazioni in 3D la differenza tra le due configurazioni è di appena due punti percentuale.
Prestazioni archivizione
| Benchmark |
Sistema di riferimento |
MIFCOM Savage GTX 1080 Ti |
Differenza |
Samsung 960 Evo 250GB |
| Crystal Disk Mark Seq Q32 T1 Read |
3168 MB/s |
3157 MB/s |
-0.35 % |
| Crystal Disk Mark Seq Q32 T1 Write |
1500 MB/s |
1516 MB/s |
1.07 % |
| Crystal Disk Mark 4K Q32 T1 Read |
764.1 MB/s |
765.2 MB/s |
0.14 % |
| Crystal Disk Mark 4K Q32 T1 Write |
679.0 MB/s |
678.2 MB/s |
-0.12 % |
| Crystal Disk Mark Seq Read |
1747 MB/s |
1745 MB/s |
-0.11 % |
| Crystal Disk Mark Seq Write |
1513 MB/s |
1512 MB/s |
-0.07 % |
| Crystal Disk Mark 4K Read |
45.48 MB/s |
46.00 MB/s |
1.14 % |
| Crystal Disk Mark 4K Write |
248.2 MB/s |
248.7 MB/s |
0.20 % |
Seagate Barracuda 2000GB |
| Crystal Disk Mark Seq Read |
178.0 MB/s |
179.4 MB/s |
0.79 % |
| Crystal Disk Mark Seq Write |
183.1 MB/s |
181.2 MB/s |
-1.04 % |
Anche in questa serie di test la differenza è minima.
MIFCOM Battlebox Titan Xp Review