MIFCOM Battlebox Titan Xp Review

Published by Luca Rocchi on 25.07.17
Page:
« 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 »

Prestazioni 2D / 3D / Archiviazione


Prestazioni 2D


Benchmark/Software Sistema di riferimento MIFCOM Battlebox Titan Xp Differenza

Sintetici

PCMark 8 Creative 6'281 6'295 Points 0.22 %
Fire Strike Physix 19'048 Marks 19'221 Marks 0.91 %
3DMark 11 Physix 15'702 Marks 15'855 Marks 0.97 %
SiSoft Sandra Arithmetics Dhrystone 249.60 GIPS 252.12 GIPS 1.01 %
SiSoft Sandra Arithmetics Whetstone 209.14 GFLOPS 215.33 GFLOPS 2.96 %
SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Integer 837.84 MPixel/sec 855.41 MPixel/sec 2.10 %
SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Floating Point 766.08 MPixel/sec 791.66 MPixel/sec 3.34 %
SiSoft Sandra Cryptography AES 20.31 GB/sec 20.31 GB/sec 0.00 %
SiSoft Sandra Cryptography SHA 11.00 GB/sec 10.72 GB/sec -2.55 %
Black Hole 21'988 Points 22'108 Points 0.55 %

Real-World

WinRAR 23'724 KB/sec 23'740 KB/sec 0.07 %
7Zip 43'583 MIPS 44'114 MIPS 1.22 %
Frybench 133 sec 132 sec -0.75 %
Cinebench R15 1'559 Points 1'581 Points 1.41 %
Handbreak h.264 26.56 fps 26.05 fps 1.92 %
Handbreak h.265 16.71 fps 16.03 fps 4.07 %
Photoshop 8.2 sec 8.0 sec -2.44 %
Microsoft Excel 379 sec 366 sec 3.43 %


La differenza media tra le prestazioni ottenute dal sistema di MIFCOM e il nostro sistema di riferimento è di circa il 2%. In altre parole il sistema è ben costruito e configurato. Solo nel benchmark di Handbreak nella modalità h.265, il sistema di MIFCOM si è dimostrato più veloce del 4.07%.

Prestazioni in 3D


Benchmark/Spiel Sistema di riferimento MIFCOM Battlebox Titan Xp Differenza

Sintetici

3DMark Time Spy - GPU Score 9'880 Marks 9'772 Marks -1.09 %
3DMark Fire Strike - GPU Score 30'380 Marks 30'521 Marks 0.46 %
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme - GPU Score 14'446 Marks 14'552 Marks 0.73 %
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra - GPU Score 7'021 Marks 7'029 Marks 0.11 %
3DMark VRMark 181.63 fps 182.66 fps 0.57 %
SteamVR Performance Test 11.00 Points 11.00 Points 0.00 %

Real-World

ArmA 3 - 1080p (FullHD) 49.00 fps 49.00 fps 0.00 %
ArmA 3 - 1440p (WHQD) 44.00 fps 44.00 fps 0.00 %
ArmA 3 - 2160p (UHD) 40.00 fps 40.00 fps 0.00 %
 
Ashes of the Singularity DX11- 1080p (FullHD) 63.50 fps 62.40 fps -1.73 %
Ashes of the Singularity DX11 - 1440p (WHQD) 62.70 fps 62.20 fps -0.80 %
Ashes of the Singularity DX11 - 2160p (UHD) 57.10 fps 57.80 fps 1.21 %
 
Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 1080p (FullHD) 78.50 fps 78.40 fps -0.13 %
Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 1440p (WHQD) 77.40 fps 76.90 fps -0.65 %
Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 2160p (UHD) 67.00 fps 67.10 fps 0.15 %
 
Doom - 1080p (FullHD) 133.85 fps 134.22 fps 0.28 %
Doom - 1440p (WHQD) 132.91 fps 133.44 fps 0.40 %
Doom - 2160p (UHD) 91.29 fps 92.11 fps 0.90 %
 
Far Cry Primal - 1080p (FullHD) 124.00 fps 123.00 fps 0.81 %
Far Cry Primal - 1440p (WHQD) 102.00 fps 101.00 fps 0.88 %
Far Cry Primal - 2160p (UHD) 60.00 fps 60.00 fps 0.00 %
 
GTA V - 1080p (FullHD) 119.04 fps 119.44 fps 0.34 %
GTA V - 1440p (WHQD) 81.66 fps 81.94 fps 0.34 %
GTA V - 2160p (UHD) 41.15 fps 41.52 fps 0.90 %
 
Rainbox Six Siege - 1080p (FullHD) 165.30 fps 165.70 fps 0.24 %
Rainbox Six Siege - 1440p (WHQD) 107.00 fps 107.20 fps 0.19 %
Rainbox Six Siege - 2160p (UHD) 54.40 fps 54.60 fps 0.37 %
 
Total War Warhammer DX11 - 1080p (FullHD) 157.20 fps 157.40 fps 0.13 %
Total War Warhammer DX11- 1440p (WHQD) 132.10 fps 132.30 fps 0.15 %
Total War Warhammer DX11 - 2160p (UHD) 75.90 fps 76.00 fps 0.13 %
 
Total War Warhammer DX12 - 1080p (FullHD) 118.70 fps 118.80 fps 0.08 %
Total War Warhammer DX12 - 1440p (WHQD) 117.90 fps 117.90 fps 0.00 %
Total War Warhammer DX12 - 2160p (UHD) 69.80 fps 69.70 fps -0.14 %
 
XCOM 2 - 1080p (FullHD) 84.10 fps 84.20 fps 0.12 %
XCOM 2 - 1440p (WHQD) 61.60 fps 61.75 fps 0.24 %
XCOM 2 - 2160p (UHD) 34.85 fps 35.05 fps 0.57 %


Anche per le prestazioni in 3D la differenza tra le due configurazioni è di appena il 2%.

Prestazioni archivizione


Benchmark Sistema di riferimento MIFCOM Battlebox Titan Xp Differenza

Samsung 960 Evo 1TB

Crystal Disk Mark Seq Q32 T1 Read 3310 MB/s 3313 MB/s 0.09 %
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Q32 T1 Write 1863 MB/s 1861 MB/s -0.11 %
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Q32 T1 Read 561.4 MB/s 560.1 MB/s -0.23 %
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Q32 T1 Write 525.0 MB/s 524.5 MB/s -0.10 %
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Read 2004 MB/s 2009 MB/s 0.25 %
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Write 1906 MB/s 1889 MB/s -0.90 %
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Read 44.51 MB/s 44.42 MB/s -0.20 %
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Write 226.0 MB/s 228.7 MB/s 1.19 %

WD Red 4000GB

Crystal Disk Mark Seq Read 144.7 MB/s 145.9 MB/s 0.83 %
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Write 144.0 MB/s 144.7 MB/s 0.49 %


Anche in questa serie di test la differenza è minima.




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Corsair ONE PRO Review MIFCOM Savage 1080 Ti Review Next article
comments powered by Disqus

MIFCOM Battlebox Titan Xp Review - PCs - Reviews - ocaholic