Prestazioni 2D / 3D / Archiviazione
Prestazioni 2D
Benchmark/Software |
Sistema di riferimento |
MIFCOM Battlebox Titan Xp |
Differenza |
Sintetici |
PCMark 8 Creative |
6'281 |
6'295 Points |
0.22 % |
Fire Strike Physix |
19'048 Marks |
19'221 Marks |
0.91 % |
3DMark 11 Physix |
15'702 Marks |
15'855 Marks |
0.97 % |
SiSoft Sandra Arithmetics Dhrystone |
249.60 GIPS |
252.12 GIPS |
1.01 % |
SiSoft Sandra Arithmetics Whetstone |
209.14 GFLOPS |
215.33 GFLOPS |
2.96 % |
SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Integer |
837.84 MPixel/sec |
855.41 MPixel/sec |
2.10 % |
SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Floating Point |
766.08 MPixel/sec |
791.66 MPixel/sec |
3.34 % |
SiSoft Sandra Cryptography AES |
20.31 GB/sec |
20.31 GB/sec |
0.00 % |
SiSoft Sandra Cryptography SHA |
11.00 GB/sec |
10.72 GB/sec |
-2.55 % |
Black Hole |
21'988 Points |
22'108 Points |
0.55 % |
Real-World |
WinRAR |
23'724 KB/sec |
23'740 KB/sec |
0.07 % |
7Zip |
43'583 MIPS |
44'114 MIPS |
1.22 % |
Frybench |
133 sec |
132 sec |
-0.75 % |
Cinebench R15 |
1'559 Points |
1'581 Points |
1.41 % |
Handbreak h.264 |
26.56 fps |
26.05 fps |
1.92 % |
Handbreak h.265 |
16.71 fps |
16.03 fps |
4.07 % |
Photoshop |
8.2 sec |
8.0 sec |
-2.44 % |
Microsoft Excel |
379 sec |
366 sec |
3.43 % |
La differenza media tra le prestazioni ottenute dal sistema di MIFCOM e il nostro sistema di riferimento è di circa il 2%. In altre parole il sistema è ben costruito e configurato. Solo nel benchmark di Handbreak nella modalità h.265, il sistema di MIFCOM si è dimostrato più veloce del 4.07%.
Prestazioni in 3D
Benchmark/Spiel |
Sistema di riferimento |
MIFCOM Battlebox Titan Xp |
Differenza |
Sintetici |
3DMark Time Spy - GPU Score |
9'880 Marks |
9'772 Marks |
-1.09 % |
3DMark Fire Strike - GPU Score |
30'380 Marks |
30'521 Marks |
0.46 % |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme - GPU Score |
14'446 Marks |
14'552 Marks |
0.73 % |
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra - GPU Score |
7'021 Marks |
7'029 Marks |
0.11 % |
3DMark VRMark |
181.63 fps |
182.66 fps |
0.57 % |
SteamVR Performance Test |
11.00 Points |
11.00 Points |
0.00 % |
Real-World |
ArmA 3 - 1080p (FullHD) |
49.00 fps |
49.00 fps |
0.00 % |
ArmA 3 - 1440p (WHQD) |
44.00 fps |
44.00 fps |
0.00 % |
ArmA 3 - 2160p (UHD) |
40.00 fps |
40.00 fps |
0.00 % |
|
Ashes of the Singularity DX11- 1080p (FullHD) |
63.50 fps |
62.40 fps |
-1.73 % |
Ashes of the Singularity DX11 - 1440p (WHQD) |
62.70 fps |
62.20 fps |
-0.80 % |
Ashes of the Singularity DX11 - 2160p (UHD) |
57.10 fps |
57.80 fps |
1.21 % |
|
Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 1080p (FullHD) |
78.50 fps |
78.40 fps |
-0.13 % |
Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 1440p (WHQD) |
77.40 fps |
76.90 fps |
-0.65 % |
Ashes of the Singularity DX12 - 2160p (UHD) |
67.00 fps |
67.10 fps |
0.15 % |
|
Doom - 1080p (FullHD) |
133.85 fps |
134.22 fps |
0.28 % |
Doom - 1440p (WHQD) |
132.91 fps |
133.44 fps |
0.40 % |
Doom - 2160p (UHD) |
91.29 fps |
92.11 fps |
0.90 % |
|
Far Cry Primal - 1080p (FullHD) |
124.00 fps |
123.00 fps |
0.81 % |
Far Cry Primal - 1440p (WHQD) |
102.00 fps |
101.00 fps |
0.88 % |
Far Cry Primal - 2160p (UHD) |
60.00 fps |
60.00 fps |
0.00 % |
|
GTA V - 1080p (FullHD) |
119.04 fps |
119.44 fps |
0.34 % |
GTA V - 1440p (WHQD) |
81.66 fps |
81.94 fps |
0.34 % |
GTA V - 2160p (UHD) |
41.15 fps |
41.52 fps |
0.90 % |
|
Rainbox Six Siege - 1080p (FullHD) |
165.30 fps |
165.70 fps |
0.24 % |
Rainbox Six Siege - 1440p (WHQD) |
107.00 fps |
107.20 fps |
0.19 % |
Rainbox Six Siege - 2160p (UHD) |
54.40 fps |
54.60 fps |
0.37 % |
|
Total War Warhammer DX11 - 1080p (FullHD) |
157.20 fps |
157.40 fps |
0.13 % |
Total War Warhammer DX11- 1440p (WHQD) |
132.10 fps |
132.30 fps |
0.15 % |
Total War Warhammer DX11 - 2160p (UHD) |
75.90 fps |
76.00 fps |
0.13 % |
|
Total War Warhammer DX12 - 1080p (FullHD) |
118.70 fps |
118.80 fps |
0.08 % |
Total War Warhammer DX12 - 1440p (WHQD) |
117.90 fps |
117.90 fps |
0.00 % |
Total War Warhammer DX12 - 2160p (UHD) |
69.80 fps |
69.70 fps |
-0.14 % |
|
XCOM 2 - 1080p (FullHD) |
84.10 fps |
84.20 fps |
0.12 % |
XCOM 2 - 1440p (WHQD) |
61.60 fps |
61.75 fps |
0.24 % |
XCOM 2 - 2160p (UHD) |
34.85 fps |
35.05 fps |
0.57 % |
Anche per le prestazioni in 3D la differenza tra le due configurazioni è di appena il 2%.
Prestazioni archivizione
Benchmark |
Sistema di riferimento |
MIFCOM Battlebox Titan Xp |
Differenza |
Samsung 960 Evo 1TB |
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Q32 T1 Read |
3310 MB/s |
3313 MB/s |
0.09 % |
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Q32 T1 Write |
1863 MB/s |
1861 MB/s |
-0.11 % |
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Q32 T1 Read |
561.4 MB/s |
560.1 MB/s |
-0.23 % |
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Q32 T1 Write |
525.0 MB/s |
524.5 MB/s |
-0.10 % |
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Read |
2004 MB/s |
2009 MB/s |
0.25 % |
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Write |
1906 MB/s |
1889 MB/s |
-0.90 % |
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Read |
44.51 MB/s |
44.42 MB/s |
-0.20 % |
Crystal Disk Mark 4K Write |
226.0 MB/s |
228.7 MB/s |
1.19 % |
WD Red 4000GB |
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Read |
144.7 MB/s |
145.9 MB/s |
0.83 % |
Crystal Disk Mark Seq Write |
144.0 MB/s |
144.7 MB/s |
0.49 % |
Anche in questa serie di test la differenza è minima.