AMD FX-8320 vs Core i5-6600K - 2D Performance

Published by Marc Büchel on 27.07.16
Page:
« 1 ... 5 6 7 (8) 9 10 11 ... 14 »

WinRAR

WinRAR is one of the most common file archiving programs. In our test we use the application’s in-built benchmark utility to determine CPU performance. Performance is measured in KB/s (kilobytes per second), where higher is better.

  KB/s %
AMD FX-8320 @ Default 7'855 157.98
AMD FX-8320 @ 4.2 GHz 8'492 170.80
     
Core i5-6600K @ Default 4'972 100.00
Core i5-6600K @ 4.2 GHz 5'740 115.45
Core i5-6600K @ 4.2 GHz DDR4-3000 6'858 137.39

7-Zip

7-Zip is an open-source file archiving program. We use the application’s built-in benchmark utility to measure CPU performance regarding compression and decompression of files. We test with a dictionary size of 32MB and use all availables threads. The results is displayed in MIPS (millions of instructions per second), where higher is better.

  MIPS %
AMD FX-8320 @ Default 20'679 123.50
AMD FX-8320 @ 4.2 GHz 24'508 146.37
     
Core i5-6600K @ Default 16'774 100.00
Core i5-6600K @ 4.2 GHz 18'776 112.14
Core i5-6600K @ 4.2 GHz DDR4-3000 19'263 115.04


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - WinRAR / 7-Zip
Page 2 - PCMark Page 9 - Frybench
Page 3 - 3DMark Page 10 - HandBrake
Page 4 - Microsoft Excel Page 11 - Photoshop
Page 5 - Cinebench Page 12 - Performance Rating
Page 6 - SiSoft Sandra Page 13 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Blackhole Page 14 - Conclusion




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Core i7-6900K vs Core i7-5960X - 2D Performance Core i7-6950X vs Core i7-6700K - 2D Performance Next article
comments powered by Disqus

AMD FX-8320 vs Core i5-6600K - 2D Performance - CPUs > Content Creation - Reviews - ocaholic