AMD FX-8320 vs Core i5-6600K - 2D Performance

Published by Marc Büchel on 27.07.16
Page:
« 1 2 (3) 4 5 6 ... 14 »

3DMark

3DMark is a benchmarking tool created and developed by Futuremark Corporation to determine the 3D rendering performance of GPU and CPU. In this article we only use the Physix workload testing routing to find out how capable a processor is. The score is measured in points where higher is better.

Fire Strike Physix

  Points %
AMD FX-8320 @ Default 6'971 80.95
AMD FX-8320 @ 4.2 GHz 8'085 93.89
     
Core i5-6600K @ Default 8'611 100.00
Core i5-6600K @ 4.2 GHz 9'185 106.67
Core i5-6600K @ 4.2 GHz DDR4-3000 9'352 108.61

3DMark 11 Physix

  Points %
AMD FX-8320 @ Default 6'398 81.36
AMD FX-8320 @ 4.2 GHz 6'908 87.84
     
Core i5-6600K @ Default 7'864 100.00
Core i5-6600K @ 4.2 GHz 8'271 105.18
Core i5-6600K @ 4.2 GHz DDR4-3000 8'845 112.47



Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - WinRAR / 7-Zip
Page 2 - PCMark Page 9 - Frybench
Page 3 - 3DMark Page 10 - HandBrake
Page 4 - Microsoft Excel Page 11 - Photoshop
Page 5 - Cinebench Page 12 - Performance Rating
Page 6 - SiSoft Sandra Page 13 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Blackhole Page 14 - Conclusion




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Core i7-6900K vs Core i7-5960X - 2D Performance Core i7-6950X vs Core i7-6700K - 2D Performance Next article
comments powered by Disqus

AMD FX-8320 vs Core i5-6600K - 2D Performance - CPUs > Content Creation - Reviews - ocaholic