Core i7-6900K vs Core i7-5960X - 2D Performance

Published by Marc Büchel on 13.07.16
Page:
« 1 2 (3) 4 5 6 ... 14 »

3DMark

3DMark is a benchmarking tool created and developed by Futuremark Corporation to determine the 3D rendering performance of GPU and CPU. In this article we only use the Physix workload testing routing to find out how capable a processor is. The score is measured in points where higher is better.

Fire Strike Physix

  Points %
Corei7-6900K @ Default 19'048 111.42
Corei7-6900K @ 4.2 GHz 20'739 121.31
Corei7-6900K @ 4.2 GHz DDR4-3000 21'148 123.70
     
Core i7-5960X @ Default 17'096 100.00
Core i7-5960X @ 4.2 GHz 20'273 118.58
Core i7-5960X @ 4.2 GHz DDR4-3000 20'623 120.63

3DMark 11 Physix

  Points %
Corei7-6900K @ Default 15'702 102.65
Corei7-6900K @ 4.2 GHz 17'497 114.39
Corei7-6900K @ 4.2 GHz DDR4-3000 19'906 130.14
     
Core i7-5960X @ Default 15'296 100.00
Core i7-5960X @ 4.2 GHz 17'006 111.18
Core i7-5960X @ 4.2 GHz DDR4-3000 19'521 127.62



Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - WinRAR / 7-Zip
Page 2 - PCMark Page 9 - Frybench
Page 3 - 3DMark Page 10 - HandBrake
Page 4 - XTU Page 11 - Photoshop
Page 5 - Cinebench Page 12 - Performance Rating
Page 6 - SiSoft Sandra Page 13 - Power Consumption
Page 7 - Blackhole Page 14 - Conclusion




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Core i7-6950X vs Core i7-5960X - 2D Performance AMD FX-8320 vs Core i5-6600K - 2D Performance Next article
comments powered by Disqus

Core i7-6900K vs Core i7-5960X - 2D Performance - CPUs > Content Creation - Reviews - ocaholic