OCZ Agility 120 GByte MLC SSD
Published by Marc Büchel on 23.11.09Page:
Test results iozone KByte/s
The test first builds a file 4 GByte big (sequential, initial write) and afterwards there will be read from this file (sequential, read). One step later there will be the same on a random basis to see the influence of the access time (random reads/writes). You can compare 4 KByte block size with a text file with only few letters in it. MP3s and movie files conist of 256 KByte and even bigger blocks. If one for example copies 10'000 text files with a size of 25 MByte it takes much longer than copying a 25 MByte movie file. This is becauseauf of the access time which has a big influence with small files. Big files on the other hand aren't affected by the block size.
iozone KByte/s, sequential write |
||
| 4 KByte | Percent | |
| OCZ Vertex 120GB MLC | 216'343 | 286.66 % |
| Intel X25-E 32 GByte SLC | 199'423 | 264.24 % |
| Kingston SSDNow V+ 64 GByte MLC | 128'928 | 170.83 % |
| OCZ Agility 128 GByte MLC | 129'183 | 117.17 % |
| OCZ Apex 120 GByte MLC | 82'798 | 109.71 % |
| Intel X25-M Gen2 34nm 160 GByte MLC | 80'022 | 106.03 % |
| Intel X25-M 80 GByte MLC | 75'471 | 100.00 % |
| Photofast G-Monster 120 GByte V2 MLC | 71'644 | 94.93 % |
| OCZ Technology Core V2 60 GByte MLC | 33'350 | 44.19 % |
| 16 KByte | Percent | |
| OCZ Vertex 120GB MLC | 213'885 | 280.77 % |
| Intel X25-E 32 GByte SLC | 201'723 | 264.82 % |
| OCZ Agility 128 GByte MLC | 132'100 | 173.41 % |
| Kingston SSDNow V+ 64 GByte MLC | 131'567 | 172.71 % |
| Intel X25-M Gen2 34nm 160 GByte MLC | 79'978 | 104.99 % |
| Intel X25-M 80 GByte MLC | 76'178 | 100.00 % |
| OCZ Apex 120 GByte MLC | 53'958 | 70.83 % |
| Photofast G-Monster 120 GByte V2 MLC | 51'354 | 67.41 % |
| OCZ Technology Core V2 60 GByte MLC | 44'491 | 58.40 % |
| 32 KByte | Percent | |
| OCZ Vertex 120GB MLC | 211'879 | 274.01 % |
| Intel X25-E 32 GByte SLC | 199'252 | 257.68 % |
| OCZ Agility 128 GByte MLC | 135'085 | 174.69 % |
| Kingston SSDNow V+ 64 GByte MLC | 131'402 | 169.93 % |
| Intel X25-M Gen2 34nm 160 GByte MLC | 79'573 | 102.91 % |
| Intel X25-M 80 GByte MLC | 77'325 | 100.00 % |
| Photofast G-Monster 120 GByte V2 MLC | 67'078 | 86.75 % |
| OCZ Apex 120 GByte MLC | 45'007 | 58.20 % |
| OCZ Technology Core V2 60 GByte MLC | 43'003 | 55.61 % |
| 64 KByte | Percent | |
| OCZ Vertex 120GB MLC | 211'021 | 275.90 % |
| Intel X25-E 32 GByte SLC | 199'987 | 261.48 % |
| OCZ Agility 128 GByte MLC | 141'906 | 185.54 % |
| Kingston SSDNow V+ 64 GByte MLC | 133'284 | 174.26 % |
| Intel X25-M Gen2 34nm 160 GByte MLC | 80'834 | 105.69 % |
| Intel X25-M 80 GByte MLC | 76'484 | 100.00 % |
| Photofast G-Monster 120 GByte V2 MLC | 62'394 | 81.58 % |
| OCZ Apex 120 GByte MLC | 51'967 | 67.94 % |
| OCZ Technology Core V2 60 GByte MLC | 44'411 | 58.07 % |
| 128 KByte | Percent | |
| Intel X25-E 32 GByte SLC | 202'228 | 261.94 % |
| OCZ Vertex 120GB MLC | 188'320 | 243.93 % |
| OCZ Agility 128 GByte MLC | 144'751 | 187.49 % |
| Kingston SSDNow V+ 64 GByte MLC | 137'731 | 178.40 % |
| Intel X25-M Gen2 34nm 160 GByte MLC | 80'405 | 104.15 % |
| Intel X25-M 80 GByte MLC | 77'204 | 100.00 % |
| Photofast G-Monster 120 GByte V2 MLC | 48'731 | 63.12 % |
| OCZ Technology Core V2 60 GByte MLC | 41'886 | 54.25 % |
| OCZ Apex 120 GByte MLC | 41'683 | 53.99 % |
| 256 KByte | Percent | |
| Intel X25-E 32 GByte SLC | 174'615 | 226.02 % |
| OCZ Vertex 120GB MLC | 163'902 | 212.15 % |
| OCZ Agility 128 GByte MLC | 146'721 | 189.91 % |
| Kingston SSDNow V+ 64 GByte MLC | 133'799 | 173.19 % |
| Intel X25-M Gen2 34nm 160 GByte MLC | 80'719 | 104.48 % |
| Intel X25-M 80 GByte MLC | 77'257 | 100.00 % |
| Photofast G-Monster 120 GByte V2 MLC | 69'601 | 90.09 % |
| OCZ Apex 120 GByte MLC | 53'332 | 69.03 % |
| OCZ Technology Core V2 60 GByte MLC | 48'008 | 62.14 % |
Discuss this article in the forum
| Navigate through the articles | |
Kingston SSDNow V+ 64 GByte |
Review: Samsung Spinpoint F3 HD103SJ 1.0 TByte
 |
|
|