Intel X25-M Gen2 34nm 160GB
Publié par Marc Büchel le 02.09.09Page:
Performance Degradation
Sequential write
| KByte/s | ||
| 4k | 29'937 | 37.41 % |
| 4k | 80'022 | 100.00 % |
| 16k | 27'457 | 34.33 % |
| 16k | 79'978 | 100.00 % |
| 32k | 26'291 | 33.04 % |
| 32k | 79'573 | 100.00 % |
| 64k | 22'595 | 27.95 % |
| 64k | 80'834 | 100.00 % |
| 128k | 35'203 | 43.78 % |
| 128k | 80'405 | 100.00 % |
| 256k | 20'097 | 24.90 % |
| 256k | 80'719 | 100.00 % |
Sequential read
| KByte/s | ||
| 4k | 213'758 | 86.20 % |
| 4k | 247'990 | 100.00 % |
| 16k | 193'146 | 77.79 % |
| 16k | 248'279 | 100.00 % |
| 32k | 185'919 | 74.90 % |
| 32k | 248'210 | 100.00 % |
| 64k | 171'270 | 68.94 % |
| 64k | 248'445 | 100.00 % |
| 128k | 157'680 | 63.39 % |
| 128k | 248'734 | 100.00 % |
| 256k | 155'311 | 62.69 % |
| 256k | 247'759 | 100.00 % |
Random write
| KByte/s | ||
| 4k | 13'534 | 21.69 % |
| 4k | 62'388 | 100.00 % |
| 16k | 13'708 | 17.06 % |
| 16k | 80'329 | 100.00 % |
| 32k | 14'216 | 17.07 % |
| 32k | 83'262 | 100.00 % |
| 64k | 15'992 | 18.82 % |
| 64k | 84'953 | 100.00 % |
| 128k | 14'469 | 17.03 % |
| 128k | 84'976 | 100.00 % |
| 256k | 18'072 | 21.16 % |
| 256k | 85'389 | 100.00 % |
Random read
| KByte/s | ||
| 4k | 57'605 | 98.22 % |
| 4k | 58'647 | 100.00 % |
| 16k | 151'827 | 99.71 % |
| 16k | 152'268 | 100.00 % |
| 32k | 208'497 | 99.99 % |
| 32k | 208'524 | 100.00 % |
| 64k | 247'280 | 98.80 % |
| 64k | 250'292 | 100.00 % |
| 128k | 279'351 | 98.17 % |
| 128k | 284'558 | 100.00 % |
| 256k | 246'021 | 99.53 % |
| 256k | 247'192 | 100.00 % |
| Naviguer à travers les articles | |
Samsung S1 1.8'' 120GByte |
Kingston SSDNow V+ 64 GByte
 |
|
|