Test results iozone
KByte/s
The test first builds a file 4
GByte big (sequential, initial write) and afterwards there will be read
from this file (sequential, read). One step later there will be the
same on a random basis to see the influence of the access time (random
reads/writes).
You can compare 4 KByte block size with a text file with only few
letters in it. MP3s and movie files conist of 256 KByte and even bigger
blocks. If one for example copies 10'000 text files with a size of 25
MByte it takes much longer than copying a 25 MByte movie file. This is
becauseauf of the access time which has a big influence with small
files. Big files on the other hand aren't affected by the block
size.
iozone KByte/s, sequential write
|
|
4
KByte |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte |
199'423 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
82'798 |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte |
75'471 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
33'350 |
|
|
|
16
KByte |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte |
201'723 |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte |
76'178 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
53'958 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
44'491 |
|
|
|
32
KByte |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte |
199'252 |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte |
77'325 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
45'007 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
43'003 |
|
|
|
64
KByte |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte |
199'987 |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte |
76'484 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
51'967 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
44'411 |
|
|
|
128
KByte |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte |
202'228 |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte |
77'204 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
41'886 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
41'683 |
|
|
|
256
KByte |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte |
174'615 |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte |
77'257 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
53'332 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
48'008 |
The OCZ Apex 120 GByte does sequential
writing more or less quickly. But the results deviation surprises. When
you compare the 4 KByte results with the 128 KByte results you can see
a factor two. But at least one thing is clear: in our test environment
the Apex doesn't reach the claimed 160 MByte/s writing performance.
iozone KByte/s, sequential read
|
|
4
KByte |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte MLC |
240'626 |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte SLC |
225'136 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
166'210 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
134'365 |
|
|
|
16
KByte |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte |
240'505 |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte |
208'589 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
165'922 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
153'477 |
|
|
|
32
KByte |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte |
239'662 |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte |
211'776 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
155'836 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
144'483 |
|
|
|
64
KByte |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte |
239'235 |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte |
217'985 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
165'396 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
145'647 |
|
|
|
128
KByte |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte |
242'603 |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte |
205'910 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
133'094 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
139'403 |
|
|
|
256
KByte |
Intel X25-M
SSD SATA 80 GByte |
240'404 |
Intel X25-E
SSD SATA 32 GByte |
223'890 |
OCZ Apex
120 GByte MLC |
166'355 |
OCZ
Technology SSD Core V2 MLC 60 GByte |
151'411 |
Sequential reading performance is good and the OCZ
Apex scores solid numbers. The only performance decrease in our test
environment was when reading 128 KByte blocks.
Discuss this article in the forum