Games
Crysis 800x600, No AA, No AF, Details: Medium, results in frames per second |
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition, 3.2 GHz | 70.23 |
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz | 59.92 |
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz | 59.44 |
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz | 51.49 |
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz | 46.11 |
more is better |
F.E.A.R, 800x600, No AA, No AF, Details: Medium, results in frames per second |
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition 3.2 GHz | 451 |
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz | 441 |
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz | 398 |
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz | 368 |
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz | 274 |
more is better |
Call of Juarez 1024x768, No AA, No AF, Details: Medium, results in frames per second |
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition 3.2 GHz | 81.2 |
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz | 78.0 |
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz | 62.6 |
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz | 61.4 |
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz | 57.9 |
more is better |
World in Conflict 800x600, No AA, No AF, Details: Medium, results in frames per second |
Intel Core I7-965 Extr. Edition,3.2 GHz | 125 |
Intel Core I7-920, 2.66 GHz | 81 |
Intel Core2 Quad Extreme Q9650, 3.0 GHz | 76 |
Intel Core2 Dual E8600, 3.3 GHz | 78 |
Intel Core2 Dual E7200, 2.53 GHz | 67 |
more is better |
Also in games Core i7 performs better than Q9650. Therefore in Crisys Core i7 is 18 percent faster, in F.E.A.R it is 13 percent faster, i Call of Juarez it is nearly 30 percent faster and in World in Conflict it is even 64 percent ahead of a Q9650.
Diesen Artikel im Forum diskutieren.