Core i7-5930K vs i7-5820K Gaming-Performance - FullHD, 1440p, UHD

Published by Hiwa Pouri on 18.02.15
Page:
« 1 ... 18 19 20 (21)

Conclusion

FullHD

Having a closer look at the results measured with FullHD resolution we see, that the performance differences are rather small. Comparing the Core i7-5820K with stock clocks to the Core i7-5930K also running stock clocks we find a difference of 1.58 percent on average. A closer look at the values gathered reveals that Sleeping Dogs shows the largest difference at this resolution. In this case we're talking about a 4.6 percent gap between the Core i7-5930K and the i7-5820K. Overclocking the processors to 4.5 GHz made as near as no difference regarding the percentage differences.

1440p

With the resolution set to 1440p we basically see the same tendencies like with FullHD although scaling with the Core i7-5930K is a little bit better. The average performance difference between a Core i7-5820K and a Core i7-5930K at stock clocks is 2.43 percent. Apparently this is virtually nothing. Browsing through all the individual results we again find a spike with Metro Last Light, where the difference is 7.07 percent towards the i7-5930K.

UHD

Even at UHD things are not becoming more interesting. Having a look at the average values, we see that the Core i7-5930K at stock clocks is 2.11 percent quicker than the Core i7-5820K with standard settings. The overall results might not be impressive again, but nevertheless there is an interesting spike again this time. It's again Metro Last Light which benefits the most from the Core i7-5930K with a 6.93 percent difference to the Core i7-5820K at stock clocks.

Power consumption

This is where we really seeing big differences. In idle the system with Core i7-5930K needs 2.94 percent more power and under load the difference is 1.69 percent. Overclocking the Core i7-5820K to 4.5 GHz makes the system pull 56 percent more power from the wall in idle and 10 percent more when under full load. In the case of the Core i7-5930K system power consumption goes up by 59 percent in case of idle and 13 percent regarding load.

Recommendation

Overall we see that CPUs aren't bottlenecking todays gaming rigs. Even at FullHD the impact of a faster graphics card is much bigger than the CPU. Nevertheless it was interesting so see that there are some games where the framerates at UHD are quite a few percent higher when using an i7-5930K. Should you be thinking about buying one of the CPUs we've had a look at in this article, we can tell you that the performance difference in case of gaming is marginal. In our opinion this will not justify what you have to pay on top for a Core i7-5930K.

Page 1 - Introduction Page 12 - Thief
Page 2 - Test Setup Page 13 - GRID Autosport
Page 3 - 3DMark Fire Strike Page 14 - Sleeping Dogs
Page 4 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Page 15 - Metro Last Light
Page 5 - Borderlands - The Pre-Sequel Page 16 - Assassin’s Creed Unity
Page 6 - BattleField 4 Page 17 - Far Cry 4
Page 7 - Watch Dogs Page 18 - Power Consumption
Page 8 - Tomb Raider Page 19 - Performance
Page 9 - Sniper Elite 3 Page 20 - Prices
Page 10 - Crysis 3 Page 21 - Conclusion
Page 11 - Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare




Navigate through the articles
Core i7-5960X vs i7-5930K Gaming-Performance - FullHD, 1440p, UHD Next article
comments powered by Disqus

Core i7-5930K vs i7-5820K Gaming-Performance - FullHD, 1440p, UHD - CPUs > CPU Gaming Performance > 2015 - Reviews - ocaholic