MX Technology MX-ES Ultra 32GB Review

Published by Luca Rocchi on 24.09.14
Page:
« 1 2 3 4 (5) 6 »

Benchmark

Crystal Disk Mark Read (MB/s)


Model Sequential Random 512KB Random 4KB Random 4KB QD32
Patriot Supersonic Magnum 128GB 278.10 246.10 11.39 11.87
MX Technology MX-ES Ultra 32GB 201.20 150.30 4.62 11.06
Patriot Boost Stellar XT 32GB 111.80 103.50 6.30 11.03
Corsair Flash Voyager 32GB 91.28 82.93 5.74 5.24
  Mehr ist besser


Crystal Disk Mark Write (MB/s)


Model Sequential Random 512KB Random 4KB Random 4KB QD32
MX Technology MX-ES Ultra 32GB 201.10 3.57 0.04 0.09
Patriot Supersonic Magnum 128GB 103.60 1.17 0.01 0.01
Corsair Flash Voyager 32GB 43.35 1.90 0.05 0.04
Patriot Boost Stellar XT 32GB 10.65 0.64 0.04 0.03
  Mehr ist besser


AS SSD Copy Benchmark - ISO


Model Speed (MB/s) Time (seconds)
MX Technology MX-ES Ultra 32GB 73.43 14.63
Patriot Supersonic Magnum 128GB 64.47 16.41
Corsair Flash Voyager 32GB 27.12 39.61
Patriot Boost Stellar XT 32GB 8.22 130.62
   


AS SSD Copy Benchmark - Program


Model Speed (MB/s) Time (seconds)
MX Technology MX-ES Ultra 32GB 19.82 70.98
Patriot Supersonic Magnum 128GB 14.45 97.37
Corsair Flash Voyager 32GB 11.48 122.58
Patriot Boost Stellar XT 32GB 5.62 250.14
   


AS SSD Copy Benchmark - Game


Model Speed (MB/s) Time (seconds)
MX Technology MX-ES Ultra 32GB 41.08 33.62
Patriot Supersonic Magnum 128GB 34.18 40.40
Corsair Flash Voyager 32GB 20.08 68.76
Patriot Boost Stellar XT 32GB 7.17 192.17
   



Seite 1 - Einleitung Seite 4 - Test Setup
Seite 2 - Vorschau Seite 5 - CrystalDiskMark und AS SSD
Seite 3 - Spezifikationen Seite 6 - Fazit





Navigate through the articles
Previous article Samsung 850 PRO SSD 256 Gigabyte Review Samsung Portable SSD T1 500GB Review Next article
comments powered by Disqus

MX Technology MX-ES Ultra 32GB Review - Speichermedien - Reviews - ocaholic