ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum In-Game Performance

Published by Christian Ney on 08.01.14
Page:
« 1 ... 7 8 9 (10) 11 12 13 ... 16 »

Far Cry 3





High Preset, 1920x1080, 8xMSAA, Ultra Average FPS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 GHz Edition 55.6
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 OC V2 54.4
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 53.2
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum 52.4
nVidia GeForce GTX TITAN 50.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 780 47.2
AMD Radeon HD 6990 39.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 770 38.2
nVidia GeForce GTX 680 35.6
nVidia GeForce GTX 670 32.2
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 31.0
AMD Radeon R9 280X 30.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 760 29.4
AMD Radeon HD 7970 27.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 27.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 580 24.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 24.6
AMD Radeon R9 270X 23.8
AMD Radeon HD 7870 22.4
AMD Radeon R9 270 22.0
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 21.2
AMD Radeon HD 6970 20.6
AMD Radeon HD 6950 18.0
AMD Radeon HD 7850 17.8
nVidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 15.4
AMD Radeon HD 5870 15.2
AMD Radeon HD 6870 13.0
AMD Radeon HD 5850 13.0
AMD Radeon HD 7790 10.6
Più alto è meglio





Pagina 1 - Test Setup Pagina 9 - DIRT Showdown
Pagina 2 - 3DMark Fire Strike Pagina 10 - Far Cry 3
Pagina 3 - Unigine Heaven 4.0 Pagina 11 - Sleeping Dogs
Pagina 4 - BattleField 3 Pagina 12 - The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Pagina 5 - Borderlands 2 Pagina 13 - Metro: Last Light
Pagina 6 - Bioshock Infinite Pagina 14 - GTA V
Pagina 7 - Crysis 3 Pagina 15 - Consumo
Pagina 8 - Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Pagina 16 - Prestazioni/Prezzo & Prestazioni/Watt



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Ti DirectCU II OC In-Game Performance PowerColor Radeon R9 280X TurboDuo OC In-Game Performance Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS GeForce GTX 780 Poseidon Platinum In-Game Performance - Schede video > Charts - Reviews - ocaholic