Review: ASUS P9X79 WS

Published by Marc Büchel on 03.02.12
Page:
« 1 ... 9 10 11 (12) 13 14 15 »

Games

Crysis 800 x 600, low details

Crysis is still one of the games which has very high system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API, High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX9 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.

Crysis DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details) fps Percent
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 149.065 106.56 %
ASUS Rampage IV Gene 148.475 106.14 %
ASUS P9X79 Pro 146.665 104.85 %
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme 146.240 104.54 %
ASUS P9X79 WS 146.135 104.47 %
ASUS P9X79 Deluxe 145.935 104.32 %
ASUS Sabertooth X79 145.855 104.27 %
ASUS Rampage IV Formula 143.740 102.76 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4-M 143.575 102.64 %
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD7 143.510 102.59 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4 143.460 102.56 %
Intel DX79SI 139.885 100.00 %
  more is better


Resident Evil 800 x 600, low details

Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX9 benchmark we can again show CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.

Resident Evil DirectX10 (800 x 600 low details) fps Percent
ASUS Rampage IV Gene 205.4 105.28 %
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 204.9 105.02 %
ASUS P9X79 WS 200.9 102.97 %
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme 200.2 102.61 %
ASUS Rampage IV Formula 199.2 102.10 %
ASUS P9X79 Pro 198.8 101.90 %
ASUS Sabertooth X79 198.6 101.79 %
ASUS P9X79 Deluxe 198.2 101.59 %
Intel DX79SI 195.1 100.00 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4-M 193.8 99.33 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4 192.2 98.51 %
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD7 191.2 98.00 %
  more is better


Street Fighter 4 800 x 600, low details

Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.

Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low details) fps Percent
ASRock X79 Extreme4-M 823.86 102.87 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4 820.72 102.47 %
ASUS P9X79 Deluxe 813.27 101.54 %
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme 812.27 101.42 %
ASUS Sabertooth X79 808.62 100.96 %
ASUS Rampage IV Formula 802.24 100.17 %
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 800.95 100.01 %
Intel DX79SI 800.90 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage IV Gene 797.34 99.56 %
ASUS P9X79 Pro 792.67 98.97 %
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD7 785.97 98.14 %
ASUS P9X79 WS 782.74 97.73 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 10 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 11 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 12 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 13 - Power Consumption
Page 6 - Test setup Page 14 - Performance Rating
Page 7 - Futuremark Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - PC Mark 07  



Discuss this article in the forums




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Review: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 Preview: MSI Big Bang Xpower II X79 Next article
comments powered by Disqus

Review: ASUS P9X79 WS - Motherboards > Intel > X79 - Reviews - ocaholic