Review: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3

Published by Marc Büchel on 26.01.12
Page:
« 1 ... 4 5 6 (7) 8 9 10 ... 15 »

3D Mark

3D Mark11

3DMark 11 is Futuremarks latest benchmark for the entire graphical subsystem. The benchmark uses DirectX 11 and it supports all recent features which can possibly generate high load on a GPU. Therefore you find tessellation, compute shader calculations, divers lighting effects and different depth of filed animations. Following we publish values regarding the performance preset of 3DMark 11.

Total

3D Mark 11 Total   Percent
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 6'627 102.17 %
ASUS Rampage IV Gene 6'550 100.99 %
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme 6'518 100.49 %
ASUS Sabertooth X79 6'515 100.45 %
ASUS P9X79 Deluxe 6'506 100.31 %
ASUS P9X79 Pro 6'505 100.29 %
ASUS Rampage IV Formula 6'499 100.20 %
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD7 6'494 100.12 %
Intel DX79SI 6'486 100.00 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4 6'482 99.94 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4-M 6'478 99.88 %
ASUS P9X79 WS 6'465 99.68 %
  more is better


Physic

3D Mark 11 Physic Score   Percent
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 11'029 106.01 %
ASUS P9X79 WS 11'019 105.91 %
ASUS Rampage IV Gene 11'009 105.82 %
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD7 10'579 101.68 %
ASUS P9X79 Deluxe 10'558 101.48 %
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme 10'557 101.47 %
ASUS P9X79 Pro 10'518 101.10 %
ASUS Sabertooth X79 10'510 101.02 %
ASUS Rampage IV Formula 10'501 100.93 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4-M 10'456 100.50 %
Intel DX79SI 10'404 100.00 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4 10'385 99.82 %
  more is better


3D Mark Vantage

3DMark Vantage is able to squeeze nearly everything out of a recent system. Therefore the feature liste is also pretty long: DirectX10, FP16-HDR, motion blur, parallax occlusion mapping, GPU-physics simulation and different shader effects are being used to even make recent high-end systems struggle.

Total

3D Mark Vantage Total   Percent
ASUS P9X79 Deluxe 26'943 102.04 %
ASUS Sabertooth X79 26'903 101.89 %
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme 26'892 101.85 %
ASUS P9X79 Pro 26'870 101.76 %
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 26'834 101.63 %
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD7 26'691 101.09 %
ASUS Rampage IV Gene 26'670 101.01 %
ASUS Rampage IV Formula 26'645 100.91 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4 26'632 100.86 %
ASUS P9X79 WS 26'620 100.82 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4-M 26'519 100.44 %
Intel DX79SI 26'404 100.00 %
  more is better


CPU

3D Mark Vantage CPU   Percent
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 32'786 103.44 %
ASUS P9X79 WS 32'721 103.23 %
ASUS Rampage IV Gene 32'541 101.80 %
ASUS P9X79 Deluxe 32'106 101.29 %
ASUS P9X79 Pro 32'090 101.24 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4-M 31'807 100.35 %
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme 31'798 100.32 %
ASUS Sabertooth X79 31'784 100.27 %
ASRock X79 Extreme4 31'736 100.12 %
Intel DX79SI 31'697 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage IV Formula 31'628 99.78 %
Gigabyte GA-X79-UD7 31'535 99.49 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 10 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 11 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 12 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 13 - Power Consumption
Page 6 - Test setup Page 14 - Performance Rating
Page 7 - Futuremark Page 15 - Conclusion
Page 8 - PC Mark 07  



Discuss this article in the forums




Navigate through the articles
Previous article Preview: ASUS P9X79 WS Review: ASUS P9X79 WS Next article
comments powered by Disqus

Review: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 - Motherboards > Intel > X79 - Reviews - ocaholic