Resident Evil 5 DirectX10
Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR,
Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder
auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5
has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11
ready. By using the DirectX10 benchmark we can again
show you CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU
overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.
Resident Evil DirectX10
800 x 600, low details
Resident Evil DirectX10 (800 x 600
low details) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 580) |
244.8 fps |
167.67 % |
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 580) |
233.9 fps |
160.21 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133
(GTX 285) |
199.9 fps |
136.92 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
195.0 fps |
135.56 % |
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
193.4 fps |
132.47 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(GTX 285) |
185.0 fps |
126.71 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(GTX 285) |
171.2 fps |
117.26 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) |
170.0 fps |
116.44 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
163.0 fps |
111.64 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
160.2 fps |
109.73 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
160.2 fps |
109.73 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
154.9 fps |
106.10 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
146.0 fps |
100.00 % |
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX
285) |
131.5 fps |
90.07 % |
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX
285) |
128.0 fps |
87.67 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333
(GTX 285) |
126.7 fps |
86.78 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333
(GTX 285) |
126.1 fps |
86.67 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) |
110.7 fps |
75.82 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333
(GTX 285) |
110.6 fps |
75.75 % |
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX
285) |
94.0 fps |
64.38 % |
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD
6550D) |
84.20 fps |
57.67 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
57.5 fps |
39.38 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
56.0 fps |
38.36 % |
|
more is better |
1920 x 1080, high details, 8x AA
Resident Evil DirectX10 (1920 x
1080 high details, 8x AA) |
|
Percent |
Intel Core i7 3960X 3.30 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 580) |
136.7 fps |
185.23 % |
Intel Core i7 3930K 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 580) |
133.9 fps |
181.44 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-2133
(GTX 285) |
76.4 fps |
103.52 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(GTX 285) |
76.0 fps |
102.98 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(GTX 285) |
75.9 fps |
102.85 % |
AMD FX-8150 3.6 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX
285) |
75.2 fps |
101.90 % |
Intel Core i7 990 X 3.46 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
75.0 fps |
101.63 % |
Intel Core i7 980 X 3.33 GHZ DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
74.8 fps |
101.36 % |
Intel Core i7 875 K 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
74.3 fps |
100.68 % |
Intel Core i7 975 XE 3.33 GHZ
DDR3-1600 (GTX 285) |
74.3 fps |
100.68 % |
Intel Core i7 965 XE 3.2 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
74.2 fps |
100.54 % |
Intel Core i7 950 3.06 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
74.1 fps |
100.41 % |
Intel Core i7 940 2.93 GHz DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
74.0 fps |
100.27 % |
Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ DDR3-1600
(GTX 285) |
73.8 fps |
100.00 % |
AMD FX-8120 3.1 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX
285) |
73.6 fps |
99.73 % |
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz
DDR3-1333 (GTX 285) |
72.9 fps |
98.78 % |
Intel Core i7 870 2.93 GHz DDR3-1333
(GTX 285) |
72.1 fps |
97.70 % |
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (GTX
285) |
69.9 fps |
94.72 % |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz DDR3-1333
(GTX 285) |
60.1 fps |
81.44 % |
Intel Core i5 750 2.66 GHz DDR3-1333
(GTX 285) |
59.2 fps |
80.22 % |
AMD A8 3850 2.90 GHz DDR3-1600 (HD
6550D) |
23.5 fps |
31.84 % |
Intel Core i7 2600K 3.40 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
10.8 fps |
14.63 % |
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.30 GHz DDR3-1333
(Intel Graphics HD3000) |
9.7 fps |
13.14 % |
|
more is better |
Discuss this article in the
forum