3DMark 11
3DMark 11 is Futuremarks
latest benchmark for the entire graphical subsystem. The benchmark uses DirectX
11 and it supports all recent features which can possibly generate high load on
a GPU. Therefore you find tessellation, compute shader calculations, divers
lighting effects and different depth of filed animations. Following we publish
values regarding the performance preset of 3DMark 11.
| 3DMark 11 Total |
Score |
Percent |
| AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire |
8'772 |
245.23 % |
| Palit GTX 580 SLI |
5'841 |
163.29 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 |
5'803 |
162.23 % |
| ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII |
5'335 |
149.15 % |
| ASUS EAH6970 2GB |
5'175 |
144.67 % |
| Zotac GTX480 SLI |
5'046 |
141.07 % |
| Zotac GTX 480 |
4'922 |
137.60 % |
| ASUS EAH6950 2GB |
4'606 |
128.77 % |
| Gigabyte GTX460 |
3'754 |
104.95 % |
| ASUS EAH6850 |
3'577 |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| 3DMark 11 GPU |
Score |
Percent |
| AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire |
10'189 |
305.52 % |
| ASUS GTX 580 |
5'812 |
174.27 % |
| Palit ENGTX 580 SLI |
5'697 |
170.82 % |
| ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII |
5'132 |
153.88 % |
| ASUS EAH6970 2GB |
4'949 |
148.40 % |
| Zotac GTX480 SLI |
4'870 |
146.03 % |
| Zotac GTX 480 |
4'802 |
143.99 % |
| ASUS EAH6950 2GB |
4'108 |
123.18 % |
| Gigabyte GTX460 |
3'562 |
106.81 % |
| ASUS EAH6850 |
3'335 |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
3DMark Vantage
3DMark Vantage is able to squeeze nearly everything out of a recent system. Therefore the feature liste is also pretty long: DirectX10, FP16-HDR, motion blur, parallax occlusion mapping, GPU-physics simulation and different shader effects are being used to even make recent high-end systems struggle.
| 3DMark Vantage |
Score |
Percent |
| Palit GTX 580 SLI |
36'482 |
262.50 % |
| AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire |
25'076 |
180.43 % |
| nVidia GTX 295 SLI |
24'638 |
177.28 % |
| Zotac GTX480 SLI |
24'520 |
176.43 % |
| ASUS ARES 5870X2 2DIS 4GD5 |
22'496 |
161.86 % |
| ASUS ENGTX 580 |
21'171 |
152.42 % |
| ZOTAC GTX 285 SLI |
19'441 |
139.88 % |
| ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII |
19'165 |
137.90 % |
| ZOTAC GTX 275 1792MB SLI |
19'098 |
137.41 % |
| ASUS EAH6970 2GB |
19'019 |
136.85 % |
| ASUS EAH5970 |
18'895 |
135.95 % |
| Gigabyte HD5870 Super Overclock |
18'244 |
131.27 % |
| Zotac GTX 480 |
17'859 |
128.50 % |
| MSI HD 5870 Lightning |
17'732 |
127.58 % |
| nVidia GTX 295 |
17'598 |
126.62 % |
| ASUS EAH6950 2GB |
17'485 |
125.81 % |
| ASUS GTX 470 |
16'730 |
120.37 % |
| ASUS EAH5870 |
16'056 |
115.52 % |
| ASUS EAH6850 DirectCU |
15'301 |
110.09 % |
| ASUS EAH5850 |
13'898 |
100.00 % |
| ASUS GTX285 Matrix |
13'047 |
93.87 % |
| MSI GTX 275 Lightning |
12'323 |
88.09 % |
| ASUS EAH3870X2 |
9'508 |
68.41 % |
| ASUS ENGTS250 DK |
8'481 |
61.02 % |
| EVGA 8800 GT 512MB |
6'427 |
46.24 % |
| |
more is better |
| 3DMark Vantage GPU |
Score |
Percent |
| Palit GTX 580 SLI |
33'378 |
254.08 % |
| AMD Radeon HD6970 CrossFire |
29'775 |
226.65 % |
| Zotac GTX480 SLI |
29'283 |
222.90 % |
| nVidia GTX 295 SLI |
29'128 |
221.72 % |
| ASUS ARES 5870X2 2DIS 4GD5 |
25'544 |
194.44 % |
| ASUS ENGTX 580 |
23'628 |
179.85 % |
| ZOTAC GTX 285 SLI |
20'715 |
157.68 % |
| ASUS HD6970 DirectCUII |
20'039 |
152.54 % |
| ZOTAC GTX 275 1792MB SLI |
19'960 |
151.93 % |
| ASUS EAH6970 2GB |
19'835 |
150.99 % |
| ASUS EAH5970 |
19'789 |
150.63 % |
| Gigabyte HD5870 Super Overclock |
18'745 |
142.68 % |
| Zotac GTX 480 |
18'345 |
139.64 % |
| MSI HD 5870 Lightning |
18'095 |
137.74 % |
| nVidia GTX 295 |
17'857 |
135.93 % |
| ASUS EAH6950 2GB |
17'679 |
134.57 % |
| ASUS EAH5870 |
15'858 |
120.71 % |
| ASUS EAH6850 DirectCU |
14'866 |
113.16 % |
| ASUS GTX 470 |
13'753 |
104.68 % |
| ASUS EAH5850 |
13'137 |
100.00 % |
| ASUS GTX285 Matrix |
12'156 |
92.53 % |
| MSI GTX 275 Lightning |
11'337 |
86.29 % |
| ASUS EAH3870X2 |
8'292 |
63.12 % |
| ASUS ENGTS250 DK |
6'722 |
51.17 % |
| EVGA 8800 GT 512MB |
5'328 |
40.55 % |
| |
more is better |
To the comments
ASUS EAH 6970 2GByte 