Gaming Benchmarks
PT Boats
PT Boats Knights of Seas is based on the Direct-3D-10 API, supports multicore CPUs and comes with a physics engine. Also at this point we see a good scaling of the CPU at low resolutions and nearly no influence when applying high resolutions.
| PT Boats, 1920 x 1080, high details, 8xAA 16xAF |
|
Percent |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
50.6 fps |
106.75 % |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
47.4 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| PT Boats, 1650 x 1080, medium details, 4xAA 8xAF |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
71.7 fps |
112.56 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
63.7 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| PT Boats, 1280 x 1024, low details, no AA/AF |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
79.1 fps |
112.52 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
70.3 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
AMD/ATI perform very well with high resolutions whereas Intel/NVIDA
show its muscles in lower resolutions.
X3 Terran Conflict
| X3 Terran Conflict, 1920 x 1080, high details, 8xAA 16xAF, |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
81.53 fps |
113.96 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
71.54 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| X3 Terran Conflict, 1650 x 1080, medium details, 4xAA 8xAF, |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
94.75 fps |
112.74 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
84.04 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| X3 Terran Conflict, 1280 x 1024, low details, no AA/AF |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
108.76 fps |
112.17 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
96.28 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
This benchmark is being dominated from Intel/NVIDA in
every single resolution and quality settings and the performance advantage over
AMD/ATI is with 12 to 13 percent rather big.
Streetfighter 4
Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.
| Streetfighter 4, 1920 x 1080, high details, C16xQ |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
143.20 fps |
155.84 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
91.89 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| Streetfighter 4, 1650 x 1080, medium details, 8x AA, |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
218.17 fps |
151.90 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
143.63 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| Streetfighter 4, 1280 x 1024, low details, no AA/AF |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
429.43 fps |
125.63 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
341.82 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
Streetfighter 4 repeats the results
seen in X3 Terran Conflict with the difference that the gap between Intel/NVIDA
and AMD/ATI got quite a bit bigger.
World in Conflict
| World in Conflict, 1920 x 1080, high details, 8xAA 16xAF |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
66 fps |
134.69 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
49 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| World in Conflict, 1650 x 1080, medium details, 4xAA 8xAF |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
114 fps |
152.00 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
75 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| World in Conflict, 1280 x 1024, low details, no AA/AF |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
194 fps |
173.21 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
112 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
World in Conflict is also being dominated by Intel/NVIDIA and AMD/ATI
doesn't see any land at all although you can see that the performance advatage
shrinks the higher the resolutions and the higher the level of detail becomes.
Resident Evil 5
Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX9 as well as the DirectX10 benchmark we can again show you CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.
| Resident Evil 5, 1920 x 1080, high details, 8xAA 16xAF |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
90.5 fps |
109.04 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
83.0 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| Resident Evil 5, 1650 x 1080, medium details, 4xAA 8xAF |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
123.3 fps |
128.71 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
95.8 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| Resident Evil 5, 1280 x 1024, low details, no AA/AF |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
139.9 fps |
128.58 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
108.8 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
Also Resident Evil scales better on an
Intel/NVIDIA platform than with AMD/ATI but again it's suspicious that the
higher resolution and level of detail the small the performance advantage of
Intel/NVIDIA becomes.
Call of Juarez
| Call of Juarez, 1920 x 1080, high details, 4xSSAA |
|
Percent |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
41.2 fps |
118.73 % |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
34.7 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| Call of Juarez, 1680 x 1050, medium details, 4xMSAA |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
89.4 fps |
107.07 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
83.5 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| Call of Juarez, 1280 x 1024, low details, no AA |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
162.8 fps |
146.27 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
111.3 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
With high resolutions and high details AMD/ATI is able to
overtake Intel/NVIDA clearly but not with lower resolution and details. There
Intel/NVIDA scores again.
Far Cry 2
| Far Cry 2, 1920 x 1080, high details, 8xAA |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
64.73 fps |
115.61 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
55.99 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| Far Cry 2, 1680 x 1050, medium details, 4xAA |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
103.05 fps |
135.13 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
76.26 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
| Far Cry 2, 1280 x 1024, low details, no AA |
|
Percent |
| Intel / Nvidia Platform (Core i7 920, GTX 470) |
137.53 fps |
143.57 % |
| AMD Leo Platform (Phenom II X6 1090T, Radeon 5870) |
95.79 fps |
100.00 % |
| |
more is better |
Also in Far Cry Intel/NVIDA is able to
show its muscles altough again we see the higher resulution and level of detail
the closer the race becomes.
To the comments
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 