Gigabyte H55-UD3H

Published by Michel90 on 03.06.10
Page:
« 1 ... 8 9 10 (11) 12 13 »

Games

Crysis 800 x 600, low details

Crysis is still one of the games which has very high system requirements. Therefore developer Crytek implemented Direct3D-10-API, High-Dynamic-Range-Rendering, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Soft Shadows, Motion Blur, Depth of Field as well as Soft Particles. We test Crysis by using DirectX9 as well as DirectX10 to show CPU-sacaling especially which low resolutions. If we look at the high resolutions we are able to spot that the CPUs influence compared to the graphic card becomes much less important.

Crysis DirectX9 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Asus P7P55D-E Premium 105.78 fps 108.79 %
Asus Sabertooth 55i 102.79 fps 105.72 %
Gigabyte H55-UD3H 101.79 fps 104.69 %
MSI P55-GD80 101.26 fps 104.14 %
Asus Maximus III Formula 101.12 fps 104.00 %
EVGA P55 Classified 200 100.84 fps 103.71 %
Gigabyte P55 UD5 100.78 fps 103.65 %
Gigabyte P55A-UD7 100.71 fps 103.58 %
Asus Maximus III GENE 100.37 fps 103.23 %
Gigabyte H57M-USB3 100.14 fps 102.99 %
Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 99.5 fps 102.33 %
Gigabyte P55 UD6 98.67 fps 101.48 %
Intel DP55KG 97.23 fps 100.00 %
  more is better


Resident Evil 800 x 600, low details

Resident Evil uses nearly every modern rendering technology: HDR, Hemisphere Lighting, Soft Shadows, Soft Particles, Field- und Motion-Blur oder auch Alpha to Coverage and static Ambient Occlusion. Furthermore Resident Evil 5 has been optimized for multicore architectures and already comes DirectX11 ready. By using the DirectX9 as well as the DirectX10 benchmark we can again show you CPU-scaling with low resolutions and the compared to the CPU overproportional influence of the graphics card at high resolutions.

Resident Evil DirectX9 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Asus Maximus III Formula 140.5 fps 116.88 %
Asus P7P55D-E Premium 139.7 fps 116.22 %
Gigabyte H55-UD3H 138.4 fps 115.14 %
Gigabyte P55 UD6 137.9 fps 114.72 %
Gigabyte P55A-UD7 137.8 fps 114.64 %
Gigabyte H57M-USB3 137.7 fps 114.56 %
Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 137.5 fps 114.39 %
EVGA P55 Classified 200 137.2 fps 114.14 %
Gigabyte P55 UD5 135.6 fps 112.81 %
Asus Sabertooth 55i 130.3 fps 108.40 %
MSI P55-GD80 129.3 fps 107.57 %
Asus Maximus III GENE 122.5 fps 101.91 %
Intel DP55KG 120.2 fps 100.00 %
  more is better


Street Fighter 4 800 x 600, low details

Street Fighter 4 comes with an extra benchmark version which makes testing you system childrens play. At low resolutions the system requirements are pretty low and we can see CPU-scaling in the results. At high resolution the graphic card becomes more important and the CPUs clock speed has less influence on the fps.

Street Fighter 4 (800 x 600 low details)   Percent
Gigabyte P55 UD5 370.77 fps 104.61 %
Asus Maximus III GENE 363.49 fps 102.56 %
Asus Sabertooth 55i 363.13 fps 102.45 %
MSI P55-GD80 362.06 fps 102.15 %
Gigabyte H57M-USB3 360.90 fps 101.83 %
Asus Maximus III Formula 360.34 fps 101.66 %
Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 359.36 fps 101.39 %
Gigabyte P55A-UD7 359.10 fps 101.32 %
Gigabyte H55-UD3H 358.97 fps 101.28 %
Gigabyte P55 UD6 358.55 fps 101.16 %
Asus P7P55D-E Premium 358.40 fps 101.12 %
Intel DP55KG 354.43 fps 100.00 %
EVGA P55 Classified 200 347.34 fps 98.00 %
  more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 8 - SiSoft Sandra 1
Page 2 - Specifications / Delivery Page 9 - SiSoft Sandra 2
Page 3 - Layout Page 10 - Super Pi / wPrime
Page 4 - Connectors and I/O Page 11 - Games
Page 5 - BIOS Page 12 - Overclocking
Page 6 - Test setup Page 13 - Conclusion
Page 7 - Futuremark  



Discuss this article in the forums




Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS Maximus III Extreme
comments powered by Disqus

Gigabyte H55-UD3H - Motherboards > Intel > P55 - Reviews - ocaholic