ASUS X99 Deluxe II Review

Published by Marc Büchel on 09.09.16
Page:
« 1 ... 14 15 16 (17) 18 19 20 ... 27 »

wPrime 2.10

wPrime 1024M Multicore

wPrime - 1024M Multi Core sec Percent
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 103.896 102.56 %
ASUS Sabertooth X99 103.913 102.54 %
ASUS Rampage V Edition 10 103.921 102.53 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe II

103.924

 102.53 %
ASRock X99E-ITX/ac 103.926 102.53 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 103.999 102.46 %
MSI X99S MPower 104.022 102.43 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 104.049 102.41 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 104.047 102.41 %
Gigabyte X99-Ultra Gaming 104.226 102.23 %
MSI X99A XPower Gaming Titanium 104.368 102.09 %
ASUS X99-A 104.488 101.98 %
ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 (Transfer Express) 104.488 101.98 %
MSI X99A Godlike Gaming 104.488 101.98 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 104.506 101.96 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 104.755 101.72 %
ASRock X99 WS 104.755 101.72 %
EVGA X99 Classified 106.554 100.00 %
less is better more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS Rampage V Edition 10 Review MSI X99A XPower Gaming Titanium Review Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS X99 Deluxe II Review - Motherboards > Intel > X99 - Reviews - ocaholic