ASUS X99 Deluxe II Review

Published by Marc Büchel on 09.09.16
Page:
« 1 ... 12 13 14 (15) 16 17 18 ... 27 »

UC Bench

UC Bench PW/sec Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 1801.8 102.41 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 1801.5 102.39 %
ASUS Rampage V Edition 10 1801.4 102.39 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 1801.3 102.38 %
MSI X99S MPower 1801.3 102.38 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 1801.2 102.38 %
ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 (Transfer Express) 1800.0 102.33 %
Gigabyte X99-Ultra Gaming 1800.0 102.33 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe II 1799.9 102.30 %
ASRock X99 WS 1799.7 102.29 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 1799.5 102.28 %
MSI X99A Godlike Gaming 1799.2 102.26 %
ASUS X99-A 1799.0 102.27 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 1798.3 102.21 %
MSI X99A XPower Gaming Titanium 1780.0 101.17 %
ASRock X99E-ITX/ac 1775.8 100.93 %
ASUS Sabertooth X99 1774.1 100.84 %
EVGA X99 Classified 1759.4 100.00 %
more is better


Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS Rampage V Edition 10 Review MSI X99A XPower Gaming Titanium Review Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS X99 Deluxe II Review - Motherboards > Intel > X99 - Reviews - ocaholic