ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 Review

Published by Marc Büchel on 14.05.15
Page:
« 1 ... 21 22 23 (24) 25 26 27 »

Power Consumption

Idle

Idle
Review Rating
 Watt Percent
ASRock X99 WS 81.15 127.11 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 81.60 126.41 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 84.50 120.91 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 85.42 120.76 %
ASUS X99-A 88.50 116.55 %
ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 (Transfer Express) 89.20 115.64 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 91.40 112.86 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 102.17 100.96 %
EVGA X99 Classified 103.15 100.00 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 105.14 98.11 %
MSI X99S MPower 108.55 95.03 %
less is better more is better


Load

Load
Review Rating
 Watt Percent
ASUS X99-A 176.20 108.20 %
ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 (Transfer Express) 176.80 107.83 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 178.20 106.99 %
ASRock X99 WS 179.75 106.97 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 183.10 104.12 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 186.77 102.08 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 187.90 101.46 %
EVGA X99 Classified 190.65 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 191.40 100.39 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 202.67 94.07 %
MSI X99S MPower 212.00 89.93 %
less is better more is better




Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS X99 WS/IPMI Review ASRock X99E-ITX/ac Review Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 Review - Motherboards > Intel > X99 - Reviews - ocaholic