ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 Review

Published by Marc Büchel on 14.05.15
Page:
« 1 ... 18 19 20 (21) 22 23 24 ... 27 »

Thief

Low resolution, low details

Thief (low details, low resolution)
Review Rating
 fps Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 138.4 103.51 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 138.4 103.51 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 138.3 103.44 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 138.3 103.44 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 138.0 103.22 %
MSI X99S MPower 135.7 101.50 %
ASRock X99 WS 135.1 101.08 %
ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 (Transfer Express) 135.0 100.97 %
ASUS X99-A 134.7 100.75 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 134.5 100.60 %
EVGA X99 Classified 133.7 100.00 %
more is better


High resolution, high details

Thief (high details, high resolution)
Review Rating
 fps Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme 84.4 102.55 %
ASRock X99 OC Formula 84.2 102.31 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force 83.2 101.09 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 83.1 100.97 %
ASRock X99 WS 82.6 100.36 %
ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 (Transfer Express) 82.5 100.24 %
ASRock X99 Extreme6 82.4 100.12 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4 82.4 100.12 %
MSI X99S MPower 82.4 100.12 %
ASUS X99-A 82.3 100.00 %
EVGA X99 Classified 82.3 100.00 %
more is better




Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article ASUS X99 WS/IPMI Review ASRock X99E-ITX/ac Review Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS X99-A USB 3.1 Review - Motherboards > Intel > X99 - Reviews - ocaholic