ASUS Rampage V Extreme Review

Published by Hiwa Pouri on 12.09.14
Page:
« 1 ... 16 17 18 (19) 20 21 22 ... 27 »

Tomb Raider

Low resolution, low details

Tomb Raider (low resolution, low details)
Review Rating
 fps Percent
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
 724.30 101.09 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 723.00 100.91 %
ASRock X99 WS 722.60 100.85 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force
n/A
 717.55 100.15 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
 716.50 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
 689.80 96.27 %
more is better


High resolution, high details

Tomb Raider (high resolution, high details)
Review Rating
 fps Percent
ASRock X99 WS 52.3 100.38 %
ASUS Rampage V Extreme
n/A
 52.3 100.38 %
ASUS X99 Deluxe 52.2 100.19 %
Gigabyte X99-SOC Force
n/A
 52.2 100.19 %
EVGA X99 Classified
n/A
 52.1 100.00 %
Gigabyte X99-UD4
n/A
 52.0 99.81 %
more is better



Page 1 - Introduction Page 15 - UC Bench
Page 2 - Specs and Delivery Page 16 - Super Pi 1M / 32M
Page 3 - Features Page 17 - wPrime 1024M Multi Core
Page 4 - Layout Page 18 - Cinebench
Page 5 - Connectors and I/O Page 19 - Tomb Raider
Page 6 - Overclocking / BIOS Page 20 - Metro Last Light
Page 7 - Test setup Page 21 - Thief
Page 8 - Preview / Gallery Page 22 - Right Mark Audio Analyzer
Page 9 - 3DMark Page 23 - BCLK Overclocking
Page 10 - 3DMark 11 Page 24 - Power Consumption
Page 11 - 3DMark Vantage Page 25 - Performance Rating
Page 12 - PC Mark 8 Page 26 - Price Comparison
Page 13 - SiSoft Sandra 1 Page 27 - Conclusion
Page 14 - SiSoft Sandra 2  



  Items by the same author View this article in PDF format Print article

Navigate through the articles
Previous article Gigabyte X99-UD4 Review Gigabyte X99 SOC Force Review Next article
comments powered by Disqus

ASUS Rampage V Extreme Review - Motherboards > Intel > X99 - Reviews - ocaholic