Sort by:
Title (
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
)
Sites currently sorted by: Title (Z to A)
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
) Sites currently sorted by: Title (Z to A)
Graphic cards
Many graphics cards have been released from the likes of AMD and Nvidia as of late including some lower end models showcasing the potential of low powered DirectX 11 cards and on the other hand we've seen some of the power hungry dual GPU monsters and today gives us a look at another one.
Graphic cards
Looking at the title, we've called this a review, but in reality, it's not really as we won't be looking at the hardware used in their own entity but instead will be purely focussing on the performance that three 6950 Radeon's can output when put into a multi GPU configuration.
Graphic cards
AMD have been in the limelight a lot as of late, especially in regards to the Radeon 6990 dual GPU monster that we looked at a little while ago. If it wasn't for the 6950 and 6970 there wouldn't have been anything to base the beast off of, therefore we thought we'd pay homage to the Radeon 6950 by taking a look at the 1GB version.
Today we have a number of brand new AMD Radeon 6800 Series cards on our test bench and will be putting them through a selection of real world tests including standard gaming, Eyefinity gaming, Stereo 3D gaming using the latest Zalman 3D monitor, 3D Blu-Ray playback and GPU computing to see where they find themselves in the marketplace.
Graphic cards
I'm going to start things off on a bad note, as you may or may not know, we took a look at the AMD Radeon 6450 not so long ago, and it was great for the general usage tasks and HTPC purposes but it didn't really get our blood pumping, but it was never really set out to do that in the first place.
Graphic cards
Recently, AMD have been pushing out their latest high-powered GPU's to very impressive results. However, at the same time they have been quietly sneaking out some smaller low-priced graphics cards. In fact this is one of the cheapest DirectX 11 graphics cards money can buy which on the face of it should be able to cope with multiple screen gaming all be it not the most intensive of media and gaming scenarios.
They say smaller is better - so based on this the AMD R9 Nano should be incredible. But is it?
Here at eTeknix, we strive to give the consumer the best possible advice in every aspect of technology. Today is no different and we are excited to bring you the CrossFireX review of the highly anticipated R9 Nano 4GB graphics cards.
The R9 Nano is the third release in the Fiji GPU core range and the third official graphics card to utilise High Bandwidth Memory (HBMv1). We’ve been impressed with the performance of the Fiji range so far with the fully unlocked R9 Fury X providing a good alternative to the NVIDIA GTX 980Ti, the R9 Fury providing a good step up from the R9 390X and the GTX 980 and the R9 Nano being the perfect option for small form factor builds. A single R9 Nano provides the perfect balance of performance, power consumption and mobility, but will combining two still be a worthwhile option?
When we test in CrossFireX, we aim to use two identical graphics card to ensure that everything is as similar as possible. When using the same cards, you can almost guarantee the same cooling capabilities, power draw, core clock and other variables. This then gives us the best possible outcome for maximum performance as the computer does not need to compensate for any differences.
AMD hat seine bislang schnellste Grafikkarte vorgestellt und sie Radeon R9 Fury X genannt. Fury X startet dabei den unmittelbaren Angriff auf NVIDIAs Flaggschiffe GeForce GTX 980 Ti und GeForce GTX Titan X. Das ist eine nicht einfache Aufgabe, denn NVIDIA hat mächtig vorgelegt. Zu Preisen um 700 Euro muss AMD unter Beweis stellen, wie sehr seine Furie wüten kann – unser Test klärt die Detailfragen.
Here at eTeknix, we strive to give the consumer the best possible advice in every aspect of technology. Today is no different, we are extremely excited to bring you the CrossFireX review of the recently released AMD Radeon R9 Fury X. As we all know, the R9 Fury X is AMD’s latest attempt to take the crown from NVIDIA in the top end consumer GPU market. In some ways, AMD has succeeded, thanks to the introduction of a new GPU architecture and the innovative High Bandwidth Memory (HBM). With the use of HBM, it has been proven that the quantity of VRAM isn’t the issue, it is the quality of the connection and bandwidth allowance for the VRAM to do its work; although more VRAM certainly couldn’t hurt.
execution time : 0.055 sec