Sort by:
Title (
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
)
Sites currently sorted by: Date (Old Links Listed First)
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
) Sites currently sorted by: Date (Old Links Listed First)
We take a look at the Trinity based A10-5800K and Vishera FX-8350 processors from AMD and see how they do in terms of all important performance.
Zuletzt hatten wir mit dem Core i5-3570K Intels leistungsstärkste Core-i5-CPU getestet. Diese entpuppte sich als der wahre Star der "Ivy Bridge"-Familie. Doch in Anbetracht von zweistelligen Strompreiserhöhungen setzen wir heute ganz andere Prioritäten und testen mit dem Core i5-3470T den sparsamsten Prozessor aus dem Core-i5-Stall.
Two things are clear. AMD's claim that its processors should run better with Windows 8 seems to be unsubstantiated, at least the benchmarks do not confirm this. Secondly, just like the gaming performance, there is no noteworthy difference between CPU performance in Windows 8 compared to Windows 7.
We're checking out the new Core i7 3970X EE from Intel. The only thing probably more insane than its performance is its price tag. Intel's top-dog is in the house!
Aktualisierte Performance- & Preis-Übersicht AMD Llano & Trinity vs. Intel Core i3 & Pentium G @ PCGH
Nach unseren Tests mit dem A10-5800K sind wir hinter den Kulissen nicht untätig geblieben und haben uns um einen Trinity-Ableger mit geringerer TDP bemüht. Wir konnten einen A8-5500 in die Finger bekommen, der für den ein oder anderen bestimmt einen interessanten Kaufkandidaten darstellt. Immerhin handelt es sich hierbei um die günstigste Trinity-APU mit zwei aktiven Modulen.
I bought the shiny new FX-4170 processor Asus M5A78L-M LX motherboard, 8 gigabytes of RAM, used an Antec 650W PSU out of a side build, purchased a motherboard, and put it all together. And (drum roll, please), got nothing. Nada. Zip.
As interesting as the third generation of Intel Core integrated processor graphics (IPG) were when they arrived in April, as home theater PC (HTPC) enthusiasts it was disappointing that the more applicable two core/four thread models were not available. We gleaned what we could about the minor processing improvements and major changes to the graphic processing unit (GPU) from the Core i7-3770K / Core i7-3770S, but as those were overkill for this space there are still many unanswered questions around how the six execution unit (EU) HD 2500 compares to sixteen EU HD 4000 and, perhaps more importantly, how 22nm Ivy Bridge (IVB) CPUs compare against the previous generation of Sandy Bridge (SNB) IPG with similar power requirements. To achieve these goals two 3.3 GHz, 55W Core i3s were tested; with only the GPU separating them – at least on the specifications sheet – let’s dig into the Intel Core i3-3220 and Intel Core i3-3225 and find out which is the better option for your next HTPC.
Après un test plutôt concluant du modèle FX-8350, nous nous attaquons ce jour à un autre processeur AMD, le FX-8320, qui partage exactement la même architecture, mais dont les cores tournent à une vitesse moindre, 3.5 GHz contre 4.0 GHz. Ce dernier est également plus accessible et offre peut être un meilleur rapport qualité/prix.
Both Intel and AMD have been puffing out their collective chests when it comes to graphics in the integrated market. It’s the one area where AMD has consistently beaten Intel in recent years. It’s an area where Intel is working overtime to redress the balance while AMD is running like a gazelle from a lion to ensure it stays ahead. With Dr Lisa Su’s recent statements at CES in Las Vegas, both sides have now declared their expectation. KitGuru pulls out the calculator to see what might happen when they get in the ring – if both side’s claims are accurate.
execution time : 0.055 sec