Sort by:
Title (
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
)
Sites currently sorted by: Popularity (Least to Most Hits)
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
) Sites currently sorted by: Popularity (Least to Most Hits)
Comme nous l'avons vu dernièrement, Intel décline maintenant ses Ivy Bridge en Core i3, mais pas seulement. En effet, les premiers Pentium exploitant l'architecture Ivy Bridge sont également de sortie et notamment le G2100T, un processeur basse consommation Dual-Core que nous allons tester ce jour.
Today we'll focus on a couple of AMD's Trinity-based budget processors. In a past review we showed that the FM1-based Athlon II X4 CPUs were quite good. Now we'll see if their counterparts are as nice.
Today AMD launches a new generation APUs, which is their term for processors with integrated graphics card. The new chips, codenamed Trinity, are the successors to the current AMD A4, A6 and A8 Llano processors. Because the performance has been significantly improved, the new series is labeled A10. The message from AMD is clear, compared to the previous generation both CPU and GPU performance has increased while the energy consumption has decreased. This means better performance per watt, which in laptops should translate to improved battery life.
The new quad-core processors will surely seize the popular status from series 700. It's clearly seen on the summary diagram. It turns out that the fourth core can make up for the lack of L3 cache.
Surely, Xeon X3450 and especially X3440 are more interesting for overclockers than Core i7 860 (cheaper, easier to overclock, demonstrate similar results at the same frequencies) or i5 750 (faster at the same frequencies). This is a curious phenomenon, considering that Xeons are designed for servers and workstations.
It’s been a busy time of year in the CPU market, with Haswell now on sale and making its stand as one mighty processor for its size, it’s time for AMD to release their update to the Trinity APU platform.
Whilst Intel’s new Z87 platform has seen a vast improvement in performance over Z77, it still has one major downside for some people and this relates to the cost. A new ground up platform means that users need to buy a new Z87 board in order to use the latest fourth generation processors and on the top end of the scale, this can equate to a large hole in the wallet. This is where AMD’s APU platform makes a strong stand against Intel. Whilst they have got their FX line of CPU’s that can perform virtually neck and neck with the 3rd Generation offerings from Intel, they do lack a built in GPU.
The APU or Accelerated Processing Unit is something that AMD have been proud of for a while now and the Trinity platform showed that with the inclusion of HD Radeon graphics into the same chip as a quad core CPU, it was able to give quite a substantial amount of power, especially for the price.
Richland is the next generation of APU’s to roll out of the AMD factories and even though AMD have made it clear that their HD Radeon 8xxx series of discrete GPUs will not be around until the early part of next year, back at the start of the year they did state that their 8000 series mobile graphics would be making appearance way before then within notebooks and within their APU’s
So what extra is there to be had over Trinity? Well over the last generation chips, AMD is promising a boost of 30-40% in performance and the biggest shouting point of all is the total cost of upgrading. Whereas Intel users need to buy both a chip and board in order to upgrade, the Richland APUs will all work on the current line of FM2 A85X motherboards with a simple BIOS update.
Other new features within Richland include the new HD Radeon 8000 series GPU cores, with up to 384 shaders, 8xAA and 16xAF support, DX11 support, DisplayPort 1.2 support and a clock speed of up to 844MHz. On top of this the A10 APUs will now also have native support DDR3-2133MHz memory speeds and the chips as a whole will offer more voltage and frequency levels for overclocking meaning that we should see some chips that are easier to work with when taking them to the next level in terms of speed.
Hardwareoverclock Austria haben einen neuen Bericht online gestellt. Anfang November wurde die neue Intel Prozessor Generation Core i7 vorgestellt. Somit hat man den ersten richtigen 4-Kerne Prozessor aus dem Hause Intel. Nach zahlreichen Kühlern und Boards wollen wir euch endlich einen der neuen Chips vorstellen, den Core i7-920.
There are many essential components to every computer – some perhaps are less important i.e. sound cards etc – but most are vital. One such component which the entire system depends on is the CPU; basically the CPU is the “heart” of the computer. But it is more than that, it is the component which performs programmed instructions, performs arithmetic and controls data input/output functions.
The 4820K could have been a real contender, as it is priced similarly to the Core i7 4770K - being even slightly cheaper - but with the benefits of the Socket 2011 platform like a quad-channel memory controller. The benchmarks however clearly show the Core i7 4770K to be the faster processor, which can be largely explained by Haswell's optimizations. Only in one benchmark is a clear benefit visible of the higher memory bandwidth. In addition, the 4770K is significantly more efficient, while Z87 motherboards as well tend to be cheaper and consume less power than X79 models. So here too we can state that only when your intended usage scenarios include a need for high memory bandwidth or the use of more than two grpahics cards, the 4820K is the better choice. In all other events, go for Socket 1150 and Haswell.
Im Test der Sandy-Bridge-CPUs Core i7-2600K, Core i5-2500K und Core i5-2400 prüft PC Games Hardware, wie schnell Intels neue Prozessor-Generation arbeitet, wie hoch der elektrische Energiekonsum ist, was die neuen Features bringen, wie sich die integrierte Grafikeinheit schlägt und vieles mehr.
execution time : 0.158 sec