Sort by:
Title (
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
)
Sites currently sorted by: Rating (Lowest Score to Highest Score)
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
) Sites currently sorted by: Rating (Lowest Score to Highest Score)
Smaller transistors, more cores, faster cores and significantly improved graphics all add up to make the Atom Z3000 a very powerful and energy-efficient processor for tablets. With Clover Trail Intel already equalled the performance and efficiency of ARM chips, and Bay Trail exceeds that level left and right. The benchmarks we ran on the two Bay Trail prototype tablets with a 1.46 GHz Atom Z3770 leave no doubt about it. In terms of CPU power, the new Atom is often up to three times faster than its predecessor. Compared to the fastest ARM chip of the moment, the Nvidia Tegra 4 with four Cortex-A15 cores, the Intel Atom Z3770 is convincingly faster. With a 95 percent market share in the server market and dominating the desktop and laptop world, after knocking out AMD, Intel has now set its sights on ARM and the mobile market. With the new Atom processors, Intel has made it clear it's bringing some serious muscle to this fight.
Im Test: Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3, der den E3-1230 v3 beerbt und erneut der Geheimtipp für Kunden ist, die eine sehr schnelle CPU ohne interne Grafik und freien Multiplikator suchen.
The Intel Broadwell processor has a 14nm die, some microcode and memory controller changes as well as the addition of an L4 cache and the new Iris graphics processor. With a base frequency of 3.3 GHz we can’t consider it a speed bump since the Haswell 4770K has a frequency of 3.5 GHz.
When it comes to desktop processors the AMD Phenom series of processors hasn’t been too phenomenal, but that could all change today as AMD is launching the Phenom II series. Will this new processor usher in a new era of value and performance or leave consumers wanting more. Read on as we go in-depth on the Phenom II and compare it to the Intel Core i7 920 processor to see how each processor does in a battery of tests.
Beim Test von AMDs Phenom II X4 810 diente uns der Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 als Vergleichsprozessor. Der Phenom II X4 810 konnte den direkten Vergleich seinerzeit zwar für sich entscheiden, doch Intels 45-nm-Einstiegsmodell in die 4-Kern-Klasse ist preiswerter und soll ein gutes Übertaktungspotential bieten. Grund genug, dem Baby-Quad auf die Zähne zu fühlen. Bekommt man für 150 Euro möglicherweise die Leistung eines Core 2 Extreme QX9770?
Zum Vergleich treten zudem zehn weitere CPUs von AMD und Intel an, darunter der Dual-Core Prozessor Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 sowie AMDs Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition und Phenom II X4 810. Wann lohnt sich ein niedrig getakteter Quad-Core Prozessor und für welche Aufgaben reichen zwei oder drei Kerne? Und wie wirkt sich der auf 4 MByte reduzierte L2-Cache des Core 2 Quad Q8200 auf seine Leistung aus?
The 3.2GHz AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition is the companies' latest quad-core processor, and it's being released in tandem with a new memory tuning tool called 'Black Edition Memory Profiles', or B.E.M.P. for short. The Phenom II's 128-bit wide memory controller still operates at 2GHz, although it has had an important fix: DDR3 memory modules can now run at 1333MHz speeds in dual-channel mode. The Phenom II 940 could only manage 1333MHz speed in single-channel mode, as soon as both memory channels were filled the memory controller would drop down to DDR3-1066MHz memory speeds.
Today at Computex, AMD took the wraps off of two highly anticipated processors: the Athlon II X2 250 and the Phenom II X2 550 Black Edition. Both are based on AMD's 45nm SOI process with the key difference being the amount of L3 cache. The Phenom II X2 550, codenamed Callisto, gets the full 6 MB cache of the Phenom II family and will serve as AMD's new flagship dual-core processor. The Athlon II X2 250, on the other hand, is based on the new native dual-core Regor die that omits the L3 cache completely and targets the mainstream segment. Benchmark Reviews was fortunate to receive samples of both processors and today we can officially share with you our results. In this review, we focus on the Phenom II X2 550 BE HDZ550WGIBOX.
AMD created a small number of limited edition “TWKR” processors expressly for the extreme overclocking community in appreciation for their record performance feats with Dragon platform technology and AMD Phenom II processors. These processors are designed to reach the utmost performance barriers of the AMD Phenom II processor and operate beyond the specifications of typical production level processors. As speculated, it’s a high current chip that can take the extreme stresses of Liquid Nitrogen overclocking. Our testing of the TWKR showed that we could reach ~6.6GHz on Liquid Nitrogen. It would be a shame if only the top overclockers and media would be able to use these, so we have teamed up with AMD to give away one of these overclocking monsters. With high end air or water cooling you should be able to take a TWKR processor up to 4.0-4.1GHz with ease and for those that want to try out dry ice, liquid nitrogen, or liquid helium you are looking at 5GHz - 7GHz depending on your pot and cooling method. These processors are monsters and have been selected and binned as being the best of the best.
während der Fokus der Betrachtungen fast aller Tests immer auf den schnellsten Prozessoren liegt, wird das große Geld jedoch in den unteren Klassen verdient. Wir haben uns deshalb das aktuelle Portfolio von Intel und AMD im Preissegment von 50 bis 130 Euro näher angesehen und satte 19 Prozessoren getestet.
Der „Lynnfield“ bringt die Ende des letzten Jahres eingeführte Nehalem-Architektur in den umkämpften Mainstream-Markt. Mit einem integrierten Speichercontroller, einem Turbo-Modus und der teilweisen Unterstützung von Hyper-Threading sollen die drei neuen Prozessoren um Kundschaft buhlen. Mit dabei ist zudem ein neuer Sockel und neue Chipsätze. Was das Komplettpaket leistet, klärt unser Test.
execution time : 0.113 sec