Sort by:
Title (
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
)
Sites currently sorted by: Date (New Links Listed First)
)
Date (
)
Rating (
)
Popularity (
) Sites currently sorted by: Date (New Links Listed First)
Avant de nous attaquer, dans un futur proche, aux Ivy Bridge, nous testons ce jour un Sandy Bridge, et plus précisément un Core i5 en version K, le 2550. Un processeur qui s'offre quelques MHz de plus pour quelques Euros de plus. Ce nouveau venu fait-il mieux que son grand frère ? Réponse dans cet article.
While setting up Gigabyte's latest Intel X79 motherboard on the PCSTATS test bench a few week ago, we found ourselves wondering; "what's the ideal amount of memory to use in a Intel Core i7 3820 'Sandy Bridge-E' platform these days?" Obviously, with a 32-bit Windows 7 OS we'd be limited to 4GB of system memory, but what's the magic number for Windows 7 64-bit?
Avec son Octo-Cores, AMD devait normalement revenir sur le devant de la scène, mais comme nous l'avons constaté dernièrement, ce ne fut pas le cas. Aujourd'hui, nous testons de nouveau un FX, dans sa déclinaison 8120 à 3.1 GHz. Les 8 cores sont donc toujours là, et les patchs aussi, ce qui devrait aider le FX.
When we look at the graphics cards that we review, we use the latest Intel X79 motherboard and the Intel Core i7 3960X processor. One of the primary reasons that we do this is to remove as much of the CPU bottleneck that we can. Though not everyone has the funds available to buy a processor that retails $1049.99. Today, we take a look at the performance scaling between six different Intel LGA1155 processors when using a high end graphics card like the AMD Radeon HD 7950.
The Intel 'Grizzly Pass' server was just recently released by Intel. Today we are going to put it through it's paces. We are going to run several Intel 710 series SSD's in a RAID 5 array and test the system as a web server with several different operating system configurations. We will also be looking at the performance of the new Intel Xeon E5-2660 LGA2011 processors! Join us as we take a look at the latest entry into the server world by Intel!
When Intel released their new Sandy Bridge-E Processors late last year there was the flagship processor the i7-3930K which has a price tag of $599 and the I7-3930X which has an even more staggering price tag of $999. When these processors were announced there was word of a more budget-friendly processor that would be out in Q1 of this year. It is here in the form of the Core i7-3820. This processor features 4 cores, features Intel’s Hyperthreading technology for up to 8 threads, a default clock speed of 3.6GHz with a turbo speed of 3.9GHz, 10MB of Intel Smart Cache, and this processor is built on the 32nm process. This processor puts Intel’s X79 platform in the reach of many people with a price tag that is half of the i7-3930K at $300. Read on to see what this processor is all about.
Nous pouvons le dire, les processeurs Sandy Bridge-E tapent de la patte, tant au niveau des performances que des prix. A 1000 ou 500 € l'exemple pour les Hexa, clairement, ce n'est pas à la portée de tous. Heureusement, un dernier modèle existe, le i7-3820, avec son tarif plus raisonnable de 280 €. Mais ce modèle seulement Quad-Core est-il capable de faire la paire ? Réponse dans cet article.
Who said all good things come in 3 fold ? Today we introduce Intel's youngest offering in the SnB-e lineup. The i7-3820 is not a hexacore like it's two bigger brothers ; the 3930K and 3960X. But a Quadcore version for the socket 2011 platform. This allows Intel to launch it at a far more affordable price then the two previous mentioned socket 2011 models. Thus making the i7-3820 maybe a perfect replacement CPU for the socket 1366 Bloomfield CPU's. But the competition is fierce, not from AMD, but within Intel's own lineup. What has this i7-3820 more to offer then eg a similar priced 2600K SnB ? After a brief introduction about this i7-3820 we are continuing straight to the results to spot any noteworthy performance differences.
Since Legit Reviews first came online nearly a decade ago the one phrase that we have heard consistently over the years is that “integrated graphics suck” and that you should never use them. Is that true? We gathered up 10 AMD and Intel motherboards to check out integrated graphics performance from 2006 to 2011 to see how they perform on four game titles and Futuremark 3Dmark06. Read on to see how far we have come in recent years.
Technic3D hat die Intel Core i7-3930k und i7-3820 Prozessoren im Test. Wem das Flaggschiff Core i7-3960X zu teuer ist, liebäugelt vieleicht mit den kleineren Modellversionen. Besser auf mehr Kerne setzen oder doch höhere Taktraten bevorzugen?
execution time : 0.090 sec